Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: richardtavor

. . .which is why the “War Between the States” is probably the best nomenclature here on FR:

“The War of Northern Aggression” overlooks the fact that the CSA fired the first shots in an attempt to dislodge the Federal garrison at Fort Sumter.

“The Civil War” accepts the unitary-state abrogation of the Tenth Amendment that the Northern position entailed.

WBTS gives a nod to the correct position of the CSA on states rights, while not being so pro-Southern as to invoke the (false) accusation of being pro-slavery.


27 posted on 07/14/2007 1:11:48 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: The_Reader_David

I agree.

With reservations as to whether the extreme states-rights position of the seceding states was correct. This is a matter of opinion, not fact.

However, it is a matter of fact that most southerners believed they were fighting primarily for their state and its rights, which means the term has a southern tinge, which is fair enough since they started the war.

Few of the soldiers from New York believed they were fighting primarily for NY.


31 posted on 07/14/2007 1:16:57 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: The_Reader_David

“of being pro-slavery.”

or pro-monopoly/industry/high control or a combination thereof


35 posted on 07/14/2007 1:24:43 PM PDT by combat_boots (She lives! 22 weeks, 9.5 inches. Go, baby, go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson