Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Rejects Claim Al Qaeda Is as Strong as It Was Prior to 9/11 (MSM, unnamed sources still lying)
Fox News ^ | 7/12/2007 | Fox news

Posted on 07/12/2007 12:01:15 PM PDT by tobyhill

WASHINGTON — A new threat assessment headed for the White House says Al Qaeda is "better positioned to strike the West," but President Bush insists the terror network is not as strong as it was before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Details of the report revealed by an unnamed counterterrorism official who revealed its contents to The Associated Press said Al Qaeda is "considerably operationally stronger than a year ago" and has "regrouped to an extent not seen since 2001."

"They are showing greater and greater ability to plan attacks in Europe and the United States," the official said. The group also has created "the most robust training program since 2001, with an interest in using European operatives," the official quoted the report as saying.

President Bush on Thursday called the terror network a "serious threat to our homeland" but said Al Qaeda is weaker than it was prior to Sept. 11, 2001, when it struck a heavy blow on the United States.

"There is a perception in the coverage that Al Qaeda may be as strong today as they were prior to September the 11th. That's just simply not the case. I think the report will say since 2001, not prior to September the 11th, 2001," Bush told reporters, referencing a new threat assessment that says Al Qaeda has reconstituted itself to a level unseen since the months before Sept. 11, 2001.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: bybybill
LOL, unnamed Plame Gang member at the CIA again, they are soooo predictable now.
21 posted on 07/12/2007 2:00:33 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

Democrats today, including the MSM, are about like the Republicans were in the 1930’s i.e. well, ostriches. The difference is the Republicans of the 1930s didn’t talk as though the United States was the enemy of decency in the world. The Republicans also didn’t sport, to my knowledge, a fat drunken blob from Massachusetts.


22 posted on 07/12/2007 3:13:02 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson