Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Want to Impeach Cheney? Think July 23rd (Ultra Barf Alert!!)
The Scoop ^ | July 10, 2007 | David Swanson

Posted on 07/12/2007 4:43:08 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The impeachment movement is gaining traction, and now - over the next two weeks - is the time to push it all the way to success. Over the weekend, supporters of impeachment made "Impeach Cheney" the number 1 video on Youtube. On Friday, for the first time, a polling company asked Americans if they want Cheney impeached. A majority of 54% said Yes, and the poll was reported in the media. Congressman John Conyers even cited it on ABC's "This Week" on Sunday.

On July 4, the day of throwing off King Georges, an Impeach Bush and Cheney petition passed 100,000 signatures! So now we're raising the bar to 1 million: http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/petition Also on July 4, Los Angeles opened an Impeachment Center, and on July 5 Philadelphia held an impeachment forum (here's the video).

But the date to keep in mind is July 23, 2007. That will be the fifth anniversary of the Downing Street Meeting, the meeting at Number 10 Downing Street at which the head of British intelligence reported that Bush and Cheney were intent on invading Iraq and were going to "fix the intelligence and facts around the policy." The meeting was recorded in the Downing Street Minutes which were leaked in May 2005. It was then that we launched a coalition and a website at AfterDowningStreet.org in order to move the Congress and the media toward impeachment.

This July 23rd, a Monday, Cindy Sheehan will lead a march from Arlington National Cemetery (gather there at 10 a.m.) to Capitol Hill, to the office of Congressman John Conyers to ask him to move forward with impeachment. We will wear orange that day, a color that has come to stand for nonviolent revolution. We encourage as many people as possible to join us, and if you cannot, to phone Congressman Conyers' office that day asking him to move forward on impeachment: (202) 225-5126.

Depending on how things go that day, some of us may choose to remain sitting in Conyers' office reading aloud the U.S. Constitution even at the risk of being arrested. Those not wishing to risk arrest will be able to leave at that point and should not be concerned about taking part. But those willing to go to jail for justice should come and join us in an act of civil disobedience, or stage a sit-in at your congress member's district office: http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/sit

The White House continues to announce its refusal to comply with a growing stack of subpoenas (http://www.democrats.com/subpoenas ), even going so far now as to try to block the testimony of former staffers who claim to be willing to testify. ABC asked Conyers about this Sunday morning, and his reply was (I don't know any other way to say this) delusional. Conyers cited the recent poll showing public support for impeachment as a reason why the White House should start complying with subpoenas, and then assured ABC (and anyone at the White House who may have been watching) that he did not intend to impeach anyone.

Here's the problem with that, Chairman Conyers: When you announce that you're bluffing, the bluff doesn't work. Impeachment has often worked as a bluff. Nixon left before he was impeached. The Supreme Court reined in Truman before he was impeached. But when you announce ahead of time that you won't really go all the way to impeachment, nothing short of impeachment has any teeth to it. Remember when you rigged the Iran Contra hearings to avoid impeachment? You got ineffective hearings, a massive cover-up, and electoral defeat. Right now you're repeating two out of three of those results, and Democratic prospects for November 2008 are looking gloomier by the day. Imagine a labor union announcing that it will never strike. It's not that you have to strike every week, but when you announce that you never will, you lose all bargaining power. As surely as the sun rises and night falls, Bush and Cheney will not comply with your subpoenas.

On July 23rd, Cindy Sheehan plans to announce her candidacy for Congress, challenging Speaker Nancy Pelosi to represent the 8th District of California. Sheehan's candidacy is motivated by Pelosi's actively blocking the impeachment of Cheney and Bush. Sheehan will not run if between now and the 23rd Pelosi backs off and allows her colleagues to make up their own minds on impeachment.

The 23rd in DC is part of a march from Texas to New York. Cindy Sheehan, Rev. Lennox Yearwood, and others are leading a march/drive from Crawford, Texas, to New York City. The march will include stops at the district offices of House Judiciary Committee Members Mel Watt, and Bobby Scott to push them to support impeachment. Their Judiciary Committee colleagues Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, and Keith Ellison have cosponsored Dennis Kucinich's articles of impeachment against Cheney, H Res 333.

Below is the route of Cindy's march and a link for more information and to get involved. Now is the time to get involved in our democracy. Use it or lose it.

July 10 Crawford Tx Houston Tx July 11 Houston Tx. New Orleans La. July 12 New Orleans La. Montgomery Al. July 13 Montgomery Al. Ft. Benning Ga July 14 Ft. Benning Ga Atlanta Ga. July 15 Atlanta Ga. Gainsville Ga. July 16 Ganisville Ga. Clemson SC July 17 Clemson SC Charlotte NC July 18 Charlotte NC Greensboro NC July 19 Greensboro NC Lynchburg VA July 20 Lynchburg VA Charlottesville VA (rally at 6 p.m.) July 21 Charlottesville VA Richmond VA July 22 Richmond VA Arlington VA July 23 Arlington Cemetery - White House / Capitol July 23 Washington DC Philadelphia PA July 24 Philadelphia PA Allentown PA July 25 Allentown PA New York City NY July 26 United Nations Action July 27 Begin to Gather at Central Park July 28 TBA July 29 Gathering of Hearts Fest Central Park http://www.thecampcaseypeaceinstitute.org


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cheney; cindysheehan; codepink; congress; defeatocrats; democrats; denniskucinich; dhimmicrats; dickcheney; gatheringofeagles; hankjohnson; impeachment; johnconyers; keithellison; maxinewaters; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
I hope the democrats are stupid enough to embrace these moonbats.
1 posted on 07/12/2007 4:43:11 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The 23rd in DC is part of a march from Texas to New York.

July 23 in central Texas... the barking moonbats will be starting a "march."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Better get the ambulances ready!

2 posted on 07/12/2007 4:47:10 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“The 23rd in DC is part of a march from Texas to New York. Cindy Sheehan, Rev. Lennox Yearwood, and others are leading a march/drive from Crawford, Texas, to New York City.”

***

Wonder how much of this will be a “drive” and how much of it will be a “march.” And if it’s a “drive,” what kind of vehicles will they be using? SUVs, buses, trucks....???? *snicker*


3 posted on 07/12/2007 4:47:53 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

[Specialist Casey] Sheehan’s father finds meaning amid grief (MUST READ!)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1861351/posts


4 posted on 07/12/2007 4:48:40 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Indianhead Division: Second To None!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The moonbats are full of rage and hate. They can't let go of their obsession with a man with who is never going to be on the ballot again.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 07/12/2007 4:48:58 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Does anyone have the story on this ‘poll’ about 54% supporting impeaching Cheney?


6 posted on 07/12/2007 4:54:15 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

http://www.americanresearchgroup.com


7 posted on 07/12/2007 4:56:51 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Indianhead Division: Second To None!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
These people are absolute losers. The power they have is given them by the MSM and they think that means a majority of people embrace their moonbattery!

Even in socialist/hippieville VT, these idiots have been trying to get this impeachment movement going, but have failed miserably! Like screwball Cindy Sheehan, who quit her "peace movement," but for some reason is now back, wants to challenge Pelosi to her congressional seat. Well, up hear in the backwoods of VT we even have a "nuttier hippy" wanting to challenge Peter Welsh, because he just won't persue impeachment.

What astounds me is these dorks don't even realize there's absolutely no case for impeachment and you can't make one just because you HATE a person!

8 posted on 07/12/2007 4:58:13 AM PDT by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"fix the intelligence and facts around the policy."

The looney left still refuses to understand that "fix" in this case means "fixate", or focus upon. The American colloquial term "fix" to indicate nefarious activity (such as rigging a game of chance) makes no sense in the context nor from a British source.

9 posted on 07/12/2007 4:58:33 AM PDT by kevkrom (The religion of global warming: "There is no goddess but Gaia and Al Gore is her profit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“The Scoop”. Perfect name. I’ve got one for my dog.


10 posted on 07/12/2007 4:59:23 AM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Demoicracy is a good system for governing a reasonably homogeneous group of people with shared values and ideals. It is not a reasonable system for sharing power between two or more groups with nothing in common at all, and who basically just hate each other. Control under those circumstances as often as not is in the hands of those who are best at gaming the system. The conclusion I come to is that the US is no longer a viable country and needs to be split up.


11 posted on 07/12/2007 5:00:50 AM PDT by rickdylan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickdylan

What type of split would you suggest?


12 posted on 07/12/2007 5:02:08 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Indianhead Division: Second To None!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This July 23rd, a Monday, Cindy Sheehan will lead a march from Arlington National Cemetery
With Cindy Chavez Sheehan leading the movement, how can it fail?
13 posted on 07/12/2007 5:04:55 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Where is “The Scoop” written and published? Mars?


14 posted on 07/12/2007 5:08:48 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It wouldn't be easy to do and it might involve a lot of people moving as was the case with Pakistan. You obviously couldn't give the rats all of the left coast. You might end up with one contiguous conservative country and two or three rat countries. The I85 corridor from Boston to NYC, the rust belt, Floriduh, and the left Coast 2/3 of the way up are not contiguous.

In theory it MIGHT be possible to have two VIRTUAL countries without anybody moving and allow people to choose which they pay taxes to and which social and legal system they want to live under, but that would seem to break down the first time there was a question of jurisdiction in a criminal case. The Nifongs, Renos, Harshbargers, Earles and Fitzpatricks are all rats and one of the basic things you'd want to achieve would be to eliminate any power those guys hold over us. At some point these abuses of the legal system become a second ammendment issue.

15 posted on 07/12/2007 5:14:16 AM PDT by rickdylan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I hope the democrats are stupid enough to embrace these moonbats.

They won't. They'll just use this as an opportunity to triangulate by repudiating these extreme views, thereby making themselves look more centrist. I don't think there are really all that many moonbats out there. If there were, the Democrats would cut off funding for the war in a minute.

16 posted on 07/12/2007 5:14:18 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The article reads like it was written by a 12 YO. The phrasing and sentence structure are juvenile.

And there seems to be something missing. What could it be?

Oh, yeah - there’s not a mention of the justification for impeaching VP Cheney. As in, what the heck has he done or not done that “rises to the level” of an impeachable offense?

The serious answer is, Nothing, but the moonbat answer is . . . . missing.


17 posted on 07/12/2007 5:14:50 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Funny stuff. Please give grounds for impeachment. Idiots...


18 posted on 07/12/2007 5:29:39 AM PDT by Edgerunner (If leftists don't like it, I do. Keep your powder dry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickdylan

please explain further. thanks. (very interesting)


19 posted on 07/12/2007 6:27:52 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“The impeachment movement is gaining traction,...”

No, it isn’t.


20 posted on 07/12/2007 6:34:28 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson