Your comments are right on. How can anyone deny that the sun has a role to play in climate change? Didn’t we recently have an example of the changes due to increased sun spot activity on immediate temp change?
Here’s the abstract in question if anyone has a way to access it:
http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/h844264320314105/
I blogged on this subject Monday, and found this letter refuting the methodology and findings of that meta analysis from a few years ago that supposedly showed that no real scientist disagreed that humans cause all global warming.
http://www.staff.livjm.ac.uk/spsbpeis/Scienceletter.htm
from the abstract
There is considerable evidence for solar influence on the Earth's pre-industrial climate and the Sun may well have been a factor in post-industrial climate change in the first half of the last century. Here we show that over the past 20 years, all the trends in the Sun that could have had an influence on the Earth's climate have been in the opposite direction to that required to explain the observed rise in global mean temperatures.
So what's your point? Who are you arguing with?