Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tesla Roadster - The most fun you can have without fuel [Jay Leno reviews plug in electric car]
timesonline.co.uk ^ | July 8, 2007 | Jay Leno

Posted on 07/10/2007 1:44:39 PM PDT by grundle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: miliantnutcase
ghey

You're kidding right?

There's nothing "ghey" about a kick ass roadster that does 0 ~ 60 in 4seconds, and tops out at 130.

A gear head is a gear head. I can do gas or, with those kind of numbers, electric. It don't matter what drives the gears.

And a Porsche would kill to have the Tesla's torque curve. Well, curve is probably an incorrect description. A box, or right angle(starting at zero when you hit the peddle) would be more appropriate.

41 posted on 07/10/2007 4:47:49 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Ack... peddle = pedal
42 posted on 07/10/2007 4:49:34 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Acceleration 0-60mph: 4sec

My, my, my...


43 posted on 07/10/2007 4:53:37 PM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

No, I understand that, I read once where if every car in the US was switched to electric, we’d save 9% on the oil we need, and that just doesn’t seem like a big savior to me. We need a completely new idea.

I mean, look at our power plants— they’re driven by steam engines! That’s amazing to me. In a nuclear power plant, the nuclear fuel rods just heat the water to make steam, still, 300 year old technology. I’m ashamed to be human- ha ha


44 posted on 07/10/2007 5:26:03 PM PDT by Bladerunnuh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bladerunnuh

Hmmmmmmmmm. Nuclear energy.


45 posted on 07/10/2007 5:36:45 PM PDT by herMANroberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nicollo
Jay just loves cars. Any cars. He has an amazing collection,

That's a fact .......


Some days, a man has to make a statement by driving a car with a 15.8-ft. wheelbase and an engine with a 16-gal. crankcase.

I see he turbo'd the Tank Car

46 posted on 07/10/2007 5:52:09 PM PDT by skeptoid (AA, UE, MBS (with clusters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid

Dang, if that’s a V12, that motor was probably put into a few boats from the “Golden Age”.


47 posted on 07/10/2007 6:00:26 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
I remember the Dynaflow transmissions Buicks had. You started out in high [direct drive] and never felt any shifting as you got to highway speed.

Actually, you started out in "low"-- the engine speed was what was high.

The classic Dynaflow was pure fluid drive; as you say, no gears. I was fascinated by a clear plastic scale model at our Buick dealers's. It sat on a little wood base and you could crank it to watch it operate. (Dad became a Buick Man in '51 and never looked back.)

Problem with Dynaflow was efficency; i.e., gas mileage. In the 60's, GM standardized on the Turbo-Hydramatic, originally an Oldsmobile design, so Buick switched to that.

Being a more traditional design, the Hydramatic had a multiple-ratio gear train (3 or 4 speeds) driven by a "torque converter," a fluid turbine that evened out the torque discontinuities at startup and during gear changes.

In contrast, the Dynaflow was just a big torque converter with no variable gearing downstream. Late designs had variable pitch blades in the turbine.

The torque converter has the interesting virtue of increasing its effective step-down ratio when the torque load on it increases, and it does this with no meshing parts; just the impeller, the turbine, and the fluid. This makes it a good complement to the hard gear ratios downstream in the main body of the transmission. And, of course, it tolerates being stalled; i.e., having the engine idle while you are stopped but still in gear. In essence, it is the equivalent of the clutch in a manual transmission.

Now the torque converter is lossy, for the same reason that the old Dynaflow was: losses in the fluid flow. Modern automatic transmissions "lock up" the torque converter during the long periods when you're just cruising along at a constant speed, making little torque demand on the engine.

48 posted on 07/10/2007 7:17:09 PM PDT by Erasmus (My simplifying explanation had the disconcerting side effect of making the subject incomprehensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

I heard it has to be recharged much sooner than advertised if you flog with some WOT time. Basically, you couldn’t take it to the race track yet.


49 posted on 07/10/2007 7:45:04 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

Bring it down to 30-40k...and I’ll take on....100k...ehhh!?


50 posted on 07/10/2007 8:02:51 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (Fred Thompson....IMWITHFRED.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase

Well WOT will drain any energy source. It may not be ready for prime time on the track, but it sure sounds a lot better than what has come before. And battery tech is getting better all the time. And I think there are other ways to extend that range, although I won’t go into that.


51 posted on 07/10/2007 8:04:46 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

I’m more excited about the Volt. That....looks sweet.


52 posted on 07/10/2007 8:07:03 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Does it have enough reserve electric power for the ultra powerful speakers that simulates a Ferrari throaty snarl upon acceleration?

Whiners will whine if all it does is whine.


53 posted on 07/10/2007 8:08:04 PM PDT by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

54 posted on 07/10/2007 8:13:19 PM PDT by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I think we’ve just found the next car for Al Gore’s kid to drive for
his next encounter with the police.

(And I’m not knocking the kid...he obviously has a problem.
If Al and Tipper were really concerned about “saving the earth”,
they’d call the “Intervention” folks at A&E channel and volunteer
to get their kid some help.)


55 posted on 07/10/2007 8:16:53 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bladerunnuh
What with “global warming” and other environmental factors; maybe you can’t use any more coal. If you could though, that 9% seems like a low-ball estimate. Maybe it’s only a 9% saving if you generate electricity with oil and gas.

Pebble-bed nuclear reactors might be one of the new ideas you’re after. The Chinese will probably be the first to build them — because they won’t have any internal opposition.

56 posted on 07/10/2007 9:50:26 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker; Dementon; eraser2005; Calpernia; DTogo; Maelstrom; Yehuda; babble-on; ...
Renewable Energy Ping

Please Freep Mail me if you'd like on/off

57 posted on 07/11/2007 7:16:36 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grundle; glock rocks; SouthTexas

Could Slot Cars be in NASCAR’S future?

The answer is, any thing is possible for the new dictator running the empire...


58 posted on 07/11/2007 7:36:21 AM PDT by tubebender (Large reward for person offering leads to my missing tag lines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

Thought about that the other day. Then we could ALL play! :)


59 posted on 07/11/2007 11:09:24 AM PDT by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

I’m not a great mechanic, but I like working with my hands and thought I would like to be one, way back in the 1960’s.

Then, thought I, the way they are talking, it will be a short time before the electric car is available, and I’ll be out of a profession.

Shows how much I knew/know.


60 posted on 07/12/2007 7:10:45 AM PDT by wizr (Freedom ain't free.. Common sense ain't common,. Read Jeremiah, Chapters 18 & 19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson