Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas State Lawmaker Opposing Deadly Force Bill Shoots Would-Be Thief (Oh, Sweet Irony Alert!)
FoxNews.com ^ | July 9, 2007 | Associated Press

Posted on 07/10/2007 4:55:17 AM PDT by OCCASparky

HOUSTON — A state lawmaker who opposed a bill giving Texans stronger right to defend themselves with deadly force pulled a gun and shot a man he says was trying to steal copper wiring from a construction site, police said Monday. Rep. Borris Miles told police he was fixing a leak on the second floor of the Houston house he's building Sunday night when he heard a noise downstairs and saw two men trying to steal the copper. After Miles confronted the pair, one of the men threw a pocketknife at him, Houston Police spokesman Victor Senties. Miles, a former law enforcement officer, shot the man in the left leg, police said. The wounded suspect was being treated at a Houston hospital. Police were trying to identify the other suspect. Charges of aggravated robbery are pending against the wounded suspect, Senties said. Police said Miles, who is in his freshman term, is licensed to carry a concealed weapon. No charges have been filed against Miles, Senties said. Miles, a Democrat, voted against a bill that gives Texans stronger legal right to defend themselves with deadly force in their homes, vehicles, and workplaces. The so-called "castle doctrine," passed by the Legislature this year, states that a person has no duty to retreat from an intruder before using deadly force. The law goes into effect Sept. 1.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: armedcitizen; banglist; hypocrite; irony; yesterday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: NRA1995
Can somebody remember the name of the Washington Post reporter who railed against private ciizens owning guns, then shot someone breaking into his home? Carl Rowan.

As I remember, the person he shot wasn't someone breaking into his house but a kid that had jumped his fence to swim in his pool.

41 posted on 07/12/2007 11:11:33 AM PDT by AnOldCowhand (The west is dead. You may lose a sweetheart, but you will never forget her - Charles Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
He needs to be put on trial.

Yep, and I'd convict him in a heartbeat if I sat on the jury, while springing Joe Sixpack, with the unwatered lawn, next door, for the same "offense".

Liberal Rats should be forced to live under their own policies even if they can't make 'em law.

Just returning the favor.

42 posted on 07/12/2007 11:22:10 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Zimbabwe, leftist success story, the envy of Venezuela)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

oh look, here’s Boris now...

http://www.borrismiles.com/


43 posted on 07/12/2007 11:28:00 AM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: OCCASparky

bump


45 posted on 07/12/2007 3:55:42 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Horse crap son, this is Texas, someone comes on my property to steal and then attacks me with anything at all I am well within my rights to shoot them dead. And that's CODE son,

Texas Penal code, Ch 9, sub Ch D Sect 9.42: A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery...etc.etc.etc. during the nightime... and it goes on and on about how we can cap people here in Texas.

GUNS don't kill. My current gun has been sitting on my bedside table for four years now and it hasn't killed a thing. That GUN requires ME to pull the trigger! And you're wrong about the pocket knife boy, you can get killed dead with as little as 1" of steel!

46 posted on 08/01/2007 8:45:48 PM PDT by ogreonamotorcycle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ogreonamotorcycle

So you’re saying that the state lawmaker was correct in voting against the bill because that was already the law anyway?


47 posted on 08/02/2007 4:45:10 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson