[[Any theory must be supported by evidence (data) - and is published for peer-review. All the other scientists read it and try to DISPROVE it. When they cannot find empirical evidence to disprove the theory - it becomes a stronger theory or a LAW]]
WRONG- they ‘TEST” the evidence with an a priori position on evolution- When they find anectdotal evidences that SEEM to support hteir own A Priori beleif, then they use their INTERPRETATIONS to support their prior INTERPRETATIONS of the evidence for evolution. Macroevolution has NEVER been shown- ALL the hypothesis for it are just that- an A Priori HYPOTHESIS- or interpretation of the evidnece- The fact that they can’t ‘disprove’ the new set of evidences does NOT in any way make it a scientific fact or even close- it simply makes it another aspect of the A Priori belief that naturalistic process’ are responsible for everyhtign we see and know. So please, spare me the ‘naturalistic is superior because it is factual’ insinuations- Naturalistic explanations rely on FAITH and NOT on factual evidence. It’s all an assumption minus difinitive absolutes and you know it!
[[ Do you understand the Scientific method?]]
Grow up.
Again, WRONG! If ANY evidence of merit that would disprove evolutionary theory were to be uncovered, it would undoubtedly make the cover of scientific journals globally - it would be a sensation and would be immediately recognized by reputable scientists everywhere. As yet, no such evidence has been uncovered. Science is a search for the truth - and it is a self-correcting process of ever-improving theories and hypotheses - unlike any religion which requires ZERO proof and claims to be the summation of all knowledge - (when current knowledge renders this obviously untrue).
Please don’t use supercilious arrogance to attempt to make your points, or to make your poison on the subject look superior to mine; to wit: “grow up”. If you have facts or data to support your hypotheses, please present them. There is no room in science for personal attacks or emotional outbursts in an attempt to cover your lack of evidence and a cogent argument.