Again, WRONG! If ANY evidence of merit that would disprove evolutionary theory were to be uncovered, it would undoubtedly make the cover of scientific journals globally - it would be a sensation and would be immediately recognized by reputable scientists everywhere. As yet, no such evidence has been uncovered. Science is a search for the truth - and it is a self-correcting process of ever-improving theories and hypotheses - unlike any religion which requires ZERO proof and claims to be the summation of all knowledge - (when current knowledge renders this obviously untrue).
Please don’t use supercilious arrogance to attempt to make your points, or to make your poison on the subject look superior to mine; to wit: “grow up”. If you have facts or data to support your hypotheses, please present them. There is no room in science for personal attacks or emotional outbursts in an attempt to cover your lack of evidence and a cogent argument.
[[There is no room in science for personal attacks or emotional outbursts in an attempt to cover your lack of evidence and a cogent argument.]]
Interpretation- there’s no room personal attacks and deriding statements except when you’re involved apparently. Your whole posts are littered with filthy little insinuations- so please- spare me the dramatics
[[As yet, no such evidence has been uncovered.]]
No such evidnece? Lol- Again- you use an a priori interpretation in order to come to that conclusion- Biological impossibilities as pointed out repeatedly isn’t evidnece to the contrary? Waving those impossibilities away by exclaiming that time cover all sins isn’t exactly valid scientific explanations
[[ As yet, no such evidence has been uncovered.]]
Absense of evidence supporting macroevolution of course wouldn’t be enough to discredit the hypothesis, becasue after all ‘it must exist, we just haven’t found it yet’
[[ As yet, no such evidence has been uncovered.]]
Mathematical impossosiblities although staggering aren’t apparently enough- waved away with the sin covering ‘time heal all wounds’ mantra.
[[ As yet, no such evidence has been uncovered.]]
Irreducible complexities... evidnece for mass extinctions due to catastrophic events... evidences for mass erosions... evidneces for the biological limits of adaption... on and on it goes- all waved away due to a priori beliefs about the preferred hypothesis- yup- you’re right- there’s not an iota of evidence to suggest the dogma... errrr science might be wrong.
[[Very simply, my source of truth is the summation of all empirical scientific evidence in existence.]]
Lol- yeppers- there’s lots of ‘empiracle evidences’ for macroevolution- boy oh boy- ya got us there. See?