Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
If they knew they were term limited out, they very well might not care...and be even more susceptible to the persuasions of those who were going to feather their nest after they were out of office.

Your point is a good one.

I'd argue the opposite, however: By implementing term limits (as well as getting rid of some other incentives) you'll be more likely to have people elected that aren't interested in going to Washington for the sole purpose of "feathering their nests".

24 posted on 06/28/2007 12:47:27 PM PDT by Egon ("If all your friends were named Cliff, would you jump off them??" - Hugh Neutron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Egon

There is some truth to that, I’m sure.

But, I for one believe that “we the people” should be able to choose whoever we want to lead us. Term limits are the easy way out.


25 posted on 06/28/2007 12:53:06 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Democrats are the Evil Party, Republicans are the Stupid Party - So, "Bipartisan"=Stupid AND Evil!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson