Posted on 06/28/2007 10:01:27 AM PDT by Politicalmom
The purpose of this list will be to inform FReepers about the nefarious or noteworthy activities undertaken by our "representatives" in Washington D.C.
Excellent idea ..please add me:)
Please add me.
Please add me.
Thanks,
PLEASE be kind enough to add me to this ping list.
(This got typed but not posted last night.) Duh, I should have searched FR instead of Thomas.gov LOL
*****
H.R.1940
Title: To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify those classes of individuals born in the United States who are nationals and citizens of the United States at birth.
Sponsor: Rep Deal, Nathan [GA-9] (introduced 4/19/2007) Cosponsors (57)
Latest Major Action: 5/4/2007 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law.
Jump to: Summary, Major Actions, All Actions, Titles, Cosponsors, Committees, Related Bill Details, Amendments
SUMMARY AS OF:
4/19/2007—Introduced.
Birthright Citizenship Act of 2007 - Amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to consider a person born in the United States “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States for citizenship at birth purposes if the person is born in the United States of parents, one of whom is: (1) a U.S. citizen or national; (2) a lawful permanent resident alien whose residence is in the United States; or (3) an alien performing active service in the armed forces.
MAJOR ACTIONS:
***NONE***
ALL ACTIONS:
4/19/2007:
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
5/4/2007:
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law.
TITLE(S): (italics indicate a title for a portion of a bill)
***NONE***
COSPONSORS(57), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]: (Sort: by date)
Rep Akin, W. Todd [MO-2] - 5/9/2007
Rep Alexander, Rodney [LA-5] - 5/9/2007
Rep Bachus, Spencer [AL-6] - 6/20/2007
Rep Baker, Richard H. [LA-6] - 5/1/2007
Rep Barrett, J. Gresham [SC-3] - 6/20/2007
Rep Bilbray, Brian P. [CA-50] - 4/19/2007
Rep Bilirakis, Gus M. [FL-9] - 5/3/2007
Rep Boozman, John [AR-3] - 5/9/2007
Rep Brady, Kevin [TX-8] - 5/1/2007
Rep Calvert, Ken [CA-44] - 6/5/2007
Rep Carter, John R. [TX-31] - 4/25/2007
Rep Coble, Howard [NC-6] - 5/9/2007
Rep Conaway, K. Michael [TX-11] - 5/1/2007
Rep Culberson, John Abney [TX-7] - 4/25/2007
Rep Davis, David [TN-1] - 4/25/2007
Rep Davis, Geoff [KY-4] - 4/26/2007
Rep Davis, Jo Ann [VA-1] - 5/3/2007
Rep Drake, Thelma D. [VA-2] - 4/25/2007
Rep Duncan, John J., Jr. [TN-2] - 5/23/2007
Rep Feeney, Tom [FL-24] - 6/5/2007
Rep Forbes, J. Randy [VA-4] - 5/9/2007
Rep Gallegly, Elton [CA-24] - 4/26/2007
Rep Gingrey, Phil [GA-11] - 4/25/2007
Rep Gohmert, Louie [TX-1] - 6/5/2007
Rep Goode, Virgil H., Jr. [VA-5] - 5/3/2007
Rep Goodlatte, Bob [VA-6] - 4/24/2007
Rep Hayes, Robin [NC-8] - 4/26/2007
Rep Hensarling, Jeb [TX-5] - 5/24/2007
Rep Herger, Wally [CA-2] - 5/1/2007
Rep Hunter, Duncan [CA-52] - 4/25/2007
Rep Issa, Darrell E. [CA-49] - 4/26/2007
Rep Johnson, Sam [TX-3] - 5/9/2007
Rep Jones, Walter B., Jr. [NC-3] - 5/17/2007
Rep Jordan, Jim [OH-4] - 6/27/2007
Rep Linder, John [GA-7] - 5/9/2007
Rep Lungren, Daniel E. [CA-3] - 4/19/2007
Rep Marchant, Kenny [TX-24] - 5/3/2007
Rep McCotter, Thaddeus G. [MI-11] - 5/9/2007
Rep McKeon, Howard P. “Buck” [CA-25] - 4/25/2007
Rep Mica, John L. [FL-7] - 6/5/2007
Rep Miller, Gary G. [CA-42] - 5/17/2007
Rep Miller, Jeff [FL-1] - 6/15/2007
Rep Myrick, Sue Wilkins [NC-9] - 5/1/2007
Rep Neugebauer, Randy [TX-19] - 6/5/2007
Rep Pence, Mike [IN-6] - 5/17/2007
Rep Poe, Ted [TX-2] - 6/22/2007
Rep Price, Tom [GA-6] - 4/25/2007
Rep Sessions, Pete [TX-32] - 5/1/2007
Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4] - 5/3/2007
Rep Souder, Mark E. [IN-3] - 5/9/2007
Rep Stearns, Cliff [FL-6] - 6/15/2007
Rep Sullivan, John [OK-1] - 4/25/2007
Rep Tancredo, Thomas G. [CO-6] - 4/25/2007
Rep Wamp, Zach [TN-3] - 5/1/2007
Rep Weldon, Dave [FL-15] - 5/9/2007
Rep Westmoreland, Lynn A. [GA-3] - 4/25/2007
Rep Wilson, Joe [SC-2] - 5/1/2007
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR01940:@@@L&summ2=m&
Have you all made your phone calls today?
I just called both local and D.C. offices of my senators and the White House.
My rep is a co-sponsor of all the good bills, so I know hes on board.
The lines went right through, so START NAGGING!!!!
Here’s another:
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 133
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny citizenship at birth to children born in the United States of parents who are not citizens or permanent resident aliens.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 4, 2007
Mr. GALLEGLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny citizenship at birth to children born in the United States of parents who are not citizens or permanent resident aliens.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Citizenship Reform Act of 2007’.
SEC. 2. PURPOSE.
It is the purpose of this Act to deny automatic citizenship at birth to children born in the United States to parents who are not citizens or permanent resident aliens.
SEC. 3. DENYING CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH FOR CHILDREN OF NON-CITIZEN, NON-PERMANENT RESIDENT ALIENS.
(a) In General- Section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101) is amended by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection:
`(d) For purposes of section 301(a), a person born in the United States shall be considered as `subject to the jurisdiction of the United States’ if—
`(1) the child was born in wedlock in the United States to a parent who is—
`(A) a citizen or national of the United States; or
`(B) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States who maintains his or her residence (as defined in subsection (a)(33)) in the United States; or
`(2) the child was born out of wedlock in the United States—
`(A) to a mother who is—
`(i) a citizen or national of the United States; or
`(ii) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States who maintains her residence (as defined in subsection (a)(33)) in the United States; or
`(B) to a father who is a citizen or national of the United States, or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States who maintains his residence (as defined in subsection (a)(33)) in the United States, but only if—
`(i) a blood relationship between the father and the child is established by clear and convincing evidence;
`(ii) the father had the nationality of the United States or was a permanent resident of the United States at the time of the child’s birth;
`(iii) the father (unless deceased) has agreed in writing to provide financial support for the child until the child reaches18 years of age; and
`(iv) while the child is under 18 years of age—
`(I) the father acknowledges paternity of the child in writing under oath; or
`(II) the paternity of the child is established by adjudication of a competent court.
For purposes of this subsection, a child is considered to be `born in wedlock’ only if both parents are married to each other and parents are not considered to be married if such marriage is only a common law marriage.’.
(b) Conforming Amendment- Section 301 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1401) is amended by inserting `(as defined in section 101(d))’ after `subject to the jurisdiction thereof’.
(c) Effective Date- The amendments made by this section shall apply to aliens born on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Please add me to your ping list. Thanks in advance.
Please add me to your ping list, thanks
Please add me to your ping list, and Thanks so Much!
Add me!
Sign me up.
We need a National Council of Legal Americans.
By request, here’s the link to yesterday’s cloture vote IN ORDER.
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/06/28/the-amnesty-cloture-vote-in-order/
Please add me to your ping list.
Thanks
Please add me to your ping list.
Thanks,
HH
Please add me to this ping list.
Thank you and GREAT WORK!!
Please add me. Thanks.
financial assistance granted to a group called la raza, THE RACE.....
LA RAZA = THE RACE. HOWEVER, THEY ARE NNNNNNOOOOOTTTTTTRACIST?
“Are we going to see illegal riots in our streets soon because this bill didnt pass?
I believe so, sponsored by La Raza.
THANKS TO OUR OWN TAX DOLLARS BEING HANDED TO THESE THUGS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.