There is a difference between ‘hate posts’ and trying to make sense of the incomprehensible, which is precisely what is going on now.
People are trying to understand why a President who presumably had good intentions at the outset is now prostrating himself before our southern neighbor.
Furthermore, his actions toward our own Border Patrol personnel are beneath contempt (or would you care to explain why those two BP should be in prison while the Mex drug dealer they were attempting to apprehend not only gets off scot free, but can sue for $5 million)
It is as if we have entered some bizarro parallel universe where right is wrong and wrong is the new cultural standard, and at the head of the mess is our President.
Calling for censorship is simply putting your head in the sand. Something is very very wrong at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Well said
I’m not calling for censorship, I am calling for reasoned analysis rather than insults. There is plenty to attack, I just think it should be done on the merits.
Quite simple:
(1) They broke the law.
(2) They lied about breaking the law afterwards.
(3) We have rules governing evidence in our courts, and their lawbreaking invalidated the evidence against the drugrunner. He would be in prison now if the agents hadn't compromised the investigation with their illegal activity.
(4) The drugrunner - like anyone else in the world - has a right to sue anyone in a US civil court.
His suit completely irrelevant to the issue. A random guy living in Kazakhstan whom you have never met could theoretically sue you in civil court tomorrow for any number of made-up reasons as long as he filed a complaint - the drugrunner's suit has nothing to do with the President or the DOJ.