Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xDGx
would you care to explain why those two BP should be in prison while the Mex drug dealer they were attempting to apprehend not only gets off scot free, but can sue for $5 million

Quite simple:

(1) They broke the law.

(2) They lied about breaking the law afterwards.

(3) We have rules governing evidence in our courts, and their lawbreaking invalidated the evidence against the drugrunner. He would be in prison now if the agents hadn't compromised the investigation with their illegal activity.

(4) The drugrunner - like anyone else in the world - has a right to sue anyone in a US civil court.

His suit completely irrelevant to the issue. A random guy living in Kazakhstan whom you have never met could theoretically sue you in civil court tomorrow for any number of made-up reasons as long as he filed a complaint - the drugrunner's suit has nothing to do with the President or the DOJ.

106 posted on 06/27/2007 9:17:10 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake

Amazing. Two BP agenst DOING THEIR JOB shoot a drug runner in the derriere and YOU take the drug-runner’s side! :o

That’s the mindset that trial lawyers look for during voir dire...


110 posted on 06/27/2007 9:19:16 AM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake
They lied about breaking the law afterwards.

What did Ignacio Ramos lie about after wards? Answer: NOTHING! What did Ramos do to "compromise an investigation into the drug dealer's crimes"? Answer: NOTHING! Or Compean for that matter.

But don't let the truth or facts get in the way of your BushBot rant.
221 posted on 06/27/2007 10:37:44 AM PDT by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson