Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Needs to be stopped.
1 posted on 06/27/2007 7:32:32 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 3AngelaD

Now if we could only clone Mike Pence and sweep out all the pro-terrorism-via-amnesty RINOs...


2 posted on 06/27/2007 7:35:19 AM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

Perhaps if the liberal networks practiced some voluntary “fairness”, their ratings wouldn’t be in the toilet.


3 posted on 06/27/2007 7:36:12 AM PDT by airborne (COULTER: Actually, my favorite candidate is [Rep.] Duncan Hunter [R-CA], and he is magnificent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

Liberals can’t compete in the marketplace of ideas, so they have to suppress and censor and crap all over the First Amendment in the name of “fairness”.


4 posted on 06/27/2007 7:36:38 AM PDT by gunservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

Pence needs Lugar’s job.


6 posted on 06/27/2007 7:37:54 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (Amnesty GOP members are betting on a Clinton nomination, to get their support back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

If the left felt that way about “fairness”, they can start with PBS, NPR, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, BBC, Rueters, AP, Pravda, Al Jezera, and all other programs and shows used as propaganda tools for the left.


10 posted on 06/27/2007 7:40:56 AM PDT by rbosque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD
In a free market, fairness should be determined based upon equal opportunity, not equal results.

And herein lies the conflict of visions. Conservatives believe in equal opportunity, ie, the same rules for everyone, and those who play within those rules in the best way, succeeds, others fail. Leftists look at the outcomes - some succeeding, and some failing, and see systemic problems with the rules. The rules must be monkeyed with by elites who know better in order to achieve equal outcomes.

11 posted on 06/27/2007 7:41:57 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

a) Free speech cannot be government regulated and remain free.

b) The media are currently 95% liberal and 5% conservative, and this so-called Fairness Doctrine aims to shut down the 5%. Is that fair? I don’t think so.


12 posted on 06/27/2007 7:42:21 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

Time to load up on XM Radio stock and short anyone who owns AM stations that Rush et al are on now. If this goes through, they’ll all take the Howard Stern “banishment” and laugh all the way to the bank. Those knotheads pushing this have no idea that the genie is out of the bottle and there are too many holes in the information dike for them to plug with their fat fingers.


14 posted on 06/27/2007 7:42:54 AM PDT by vajimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD
This 'Havana radio' style bill must be stopped. People need to realize this is nothing more than communist style, 'government radio'; and not the dissemination of 'free information' but a closing down of 'free market' information.

It is outrageous; but am concerned that it has gotten 'this far'; and we now how a fresh harvest of 'head-bobbers' out there.

15 posted on 06/27/2007 7:43:25 AM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD
So the dems want to "level the playing field" with respect to "public airwaves"? This could be fun if it passes; for instance:

We could demand equal "fairness" with respect to other media distribution channels, e.g. "public roads". IOW, require that newspapers, magazines, etc. "level the playing field" because they use "public roads" to distribute their content. Same with broadcast TV news--they too use "public airwaves" to distribute their content.

19 posted on 06/27/2007 7:47:04 AM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD
What I don't understand is how the Dems are going to restrict this only to talk radio.

If an ABC/CBS/CNN/FOX/NBC TV reporter can state their political/personnel opinion why wouldn't they have to also give equal time to an opposing point of view?

20 posted on 06/27/2007 7:48:25 AM PDT by rocksblues (Just enforce the law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

Getting out in front of this issue may be the best way to combat it.


25 posted on 06/27/2007 7:55:33 AM PDT by maxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

Pence is a good man! This is not the first time, by a long shot, he has stood up for what is right. A real Conservtive.


27 posted on 06/27/2007 7:59:35 AM PDT by gidget7 ( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD

This is even worse than that great Whore of Babylon, McCain-Feingold. Absolutely disgusting. If this passes, the left are our dictators.


37 posted on 06/27/2007 12:20:41 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson