Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pence introduces legislation to block Fairness Doctrine
Michelle Malkin ^ | June 27, 2007

Posted on 06/27/2007 7:32:29 AM PDT by 3AngelaD

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Needs to be stopped.
1 posted on 06/27/2007 7:32:32 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Now if we could only clone Mike Pence and sweep out all the pro-terrorism-via-amnesty RINOs...


2 posted on 06/27/2007 7:35:19 AM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Perhaps if the liberal networks practiced some voluntary “fairness”, their ratings wouldn’t be in the toilet.


3 posted on 06/27/2007 7:36:12 AM PDT by airborne (COULTER: Actually, my favorite candidate is [Rep.] Duncan Hunter [R-CA], and he is magnificent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Liberals can’t compete in the marketplace of ideas, so they have to suppress and censor and crap all over the First Amendment in the name of “fairness”.


4 posted on 06/27/2007 7:36:38 AM PDT by gunservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kromike

God bless, Pence, who truly understands the first amendment!


5 posted on 06/27/2007 7:37:07 AM PDT by swatbuznik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Pence needs Lugar’s job.


6 posted on 06/27/2007 7:37:54 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (Amnesty GOP members are betting on a Clinton nomination, to get their support back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik

Yes!


7 posted on 06/27/2007 7:38:21 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik
God bless, Pence, who truly understands the first amendment!

Do you or anyone else know, if he has endorsed anyone for POTUS yet?

8 posted on 06/27/2007 7:38:37 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: swatbuznik

As an aside, do you notice how our reps are now stepping up more than the senators?


9 posted on 06/27/2007 7:39:43 AM PDT by swatbuznik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

If the left felt that way about “fairness”, they can start with PBS, NPR, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, BBC, Rueters, AP, Pravda, Al Jezera, and all other programs and shows used as propaganda tools for the left.


10 posted on 06/27/2007 7:40:56 AM PDT by rbosque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
In a free market, fairness should be determined based upon equal opportunity, not equal results.

And herein lies the conflict of visions. Conservatives believe in equal opportunity, ie, the same rules for everyone, and those who play within those rules in the best way, succeeds, others fail. Leftists look at the outcomes - some succeeding, and some failing, and see systemic problems with the rules. The rules must be monkeyed with by elites who know better in order to achieve equal outcomes.

11 posted on 06/27/2007 7:41:57 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

a) Free speech cannot be government regulated and remain free.

b) The media are currently 95% liberal and 5% conservative, and this so-called Fairness Doctrine aims to shut down the 5%. Is that fair? I don’t think so.


12 posted on 06/27/2007 7:42:21 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbosque

“Fairness”, as we all know, will be a one way ratchet to the left.


13 posted on 06/27/2007 7:42:31 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Time to load up on XM Radio stock and short anyone who owns AM stations that Rush et al are on now. If this goes through, they’ll all take the Howard Stern “banishment” and laugh all the way to the bank. Those knotheads pushing this have no idea that the genie is out of the bottle and there are too many holes in the information dike for them to plug with their fat fingers.


14 posted on 06/27/2007 7:42:54 AM PDT by vajimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
This 'Havana radio' style bill must be stopped. People need to realize this is nothing more than communist style, 'government radio'; and not the dissemination of 'free information' but a closing down of 'free market' information.

It is outrageous; but am concerned that it has gotten 'this far'; and we now how a fresh harvest of 'head-bobbers' out there.

15 posted on 06/27/2007 7:43:25 AM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Appearantly.


16 posted on 06/27/2007 7:43:29 AM PDT by rbosque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Yup. Lugar is a burned-out, tired old loser, who DOESN’T GET IT.


17 posted on 06/27/2007 7:43:54 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kromike

Mike Pence needs to sneak wording into this bill that negates McCain-Feingold and put the dems in a position of voting against freedom of speech if they dare.


18 posted on 06/27/2007 7:46:30 AM PDT by Wil H (Islam - the religion of perpetual outrage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
So the dems want to "level the playing field" with respect to "public airwaves"? This could be fun if it passes; for instance:

We could demand equal "fairness" with respect to other media distribution channels, e.g. "public roads". IOW, require that newspapers, magazines, etc. "level the playing field" because they use "public roads" to distribute their content. Same with broadcast TV news--they too use "public airwaves" to distribute their content.

19 posted on 06/27/2007 7:47:04 AM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
What I don't understand is how the Dems are going to restrict this only to talk radio.

If an ABC/CBS/CNN/FOX/NBC TV reporter can state their political/personnel opinion why wouldn't they have to also give equal time to an opposing point of view?

20 posted on 06/27/2007 7:48:25 AM PDT by rocksblues (Just enforce the law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson