Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Corner" Blog:Backroom Deal: Yes to Cloture, then Meaningless Amendment, then No to Second Cloture
"Corner" Blog-National Review Online ^ | 6/25/07 | Rich Lowry

Posted on 06/25/2007 3:14:37 PM PDT by Jacksonville Patriot

Cloture Buy-Offs [Rich Lowry]

One method supporters of the bill are apparently using to good effect is to promise senators votes on their amendments to get them to vote for cloture. This is working even when it is amendments that have no chance of passing. For instance, Sen. Bond's office tells me that he is going to vote for cloture on the motion to proceed. He will then offer an amendment that has made the approved list to strip out the path of citizenship in the bill (meaning no green cards). This will inevitably fail. In which case, Bond will vote against cloture the second time and against final passage. This dynamic means opponents of the bill might pick up a vote or two on the second cloture vote, but Bond will still have done his bit to advance the underlying bill through his first cloture vote. He should just vote "no" tomorrow.

06/25 06:09 PM


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: aliens; cloture; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist; immigration; kitbond; vampirebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: deport
I’m with you...I don’t think there is a second cloture vote. That is the whole reason for the “Clay Pigeon” approach. After cloture, the final passage is a straight up 50 votes for passage. This is why flakes like Burr can vote for cloture and against the final bill and have it both ways.
21 posted on 06/25/2007 3:38:10 PM PDT by bennowens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Understand...... Thanks


22 posted on 06/25/2007 3:38:13 PM PDT by deport ( Cue Spooky Music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: deport

Parliamentary procedure can be fun!! If you have a really strange mind.


23 posted on 06/25/2007 3:41:11 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (A person who does not want the best for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

A vote “no” would spare everyone the concern Senator Bond, why complicate things if you don’t support this bill..?

Oh I get it.....


24 posted on 06/25/2007 3:43:05 PM PDT by padre35 (GWB chose Amnesty as his hill to die on, not Social Security reform.....that speaks much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

The latest clarification from Sen. Boxer ... I know - probably a waste of energy on her but I included her in the list ... because she “choke” represents me.

Dear Mr. nnnnn:

Thank you for contacting me to express your views on immigration reform. I appreciate hearing from you.

As you may know, the Senate recently debated the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007.

In its initial form, this bill was unworkable and unfair. I was particularly troubled by its proposal to create a new guestworker program. I have always had problems with guestworker programs because I believe they lead to increased illegal immigration, a downward pressure on American wages, and a loss of workplace protections.

That is why on June 7, 2007, I voted to prevent the bill from proceeding to a final vote. A revised version of the bill has since been introduced in the Senate as S.1639. Be assured that I am working to improve this bill, and I will continue to fight for measures that protect American workers and reduce illegal immigration.

Again, thank you for writing to me. Please feel free to contact me again about this or any other issue of concern to you.

Barbara Boxer
United States Senator

Please visit my website at http://boxer.senate.gov


25 posted on 06/25/2007 3:48:04 PM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot
NB it worked with Kit Bond, R-MO

Does that mean Bond is no longer sitting on the fence and will vote against cloture?

I sent him an email earlier today but could not call from work.

26 posted on 06/25/2007 3:48:04 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (http://www.imwithfred.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldhunk

Right, but it will pick up votes before the second votes with back room “pet amendments” making it more likely to pass the second time.


27 posted on 06/25/2007 3:49:17 PM PDT by RightthinkinAmerican (If vegetarians eat vegetables, what do Humanitarians eat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Oldhunk

Its a shell game, which has repeated many times over and over again in the Senate. Assuming he votes for clouture the first time, Senator Bond knows his amendment will not pass in the Senate. If it does not he can supposedly safely vote against the bill on final passage, which requires only 51 votes to pass, thereby claiming he was against the bill to begin with. In other words he will have voted for the bill before he voted against it.


28 posted on 06/25/2007 3:53:41 PM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

bump


29 posted on 06/25/2007 3:55:22 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Parliamentary procedure can be fun!! If you have a really strange mind.
I used to be on a Parliamentary competition team back in high school. It was fun but Mr. Robert would roll over at the rules under which the Senate uses....

The following is the issue at stake presently.....

COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM ACT OF 2007 -- (Senate - June 20, 2007)

[Page: S8158]  GPO's PDF

---

   CLOTURE MOTION

   Mr. REID. Mr. President, if I could do a little bit of business, and I will yield to the distinguished Senator from Delaware.

   I was going to ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the consideration of S. 1639, the immigration legislation, at a time to be determined by the majority leader following consultation with the Republican leader. However, I am advised there would be an objection from the Republican side, so I am not going to ask for that unanimous consent.

   Therefore, I move to proceed to Calendar No. 208, S. 1639, and I send a cloture motion to the desk.

   The PRESIDING OFFICER. The cloture motion having been presented under rule XXII, the Chair directs the clerk to read the motion.

[Page: S8159]  GPO's PDF

   The legislative clerk read as follows:

   Cloture Motion

   We, the undersigned Senators, in accordance with the provisions of rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the motion to proceed to Calendar No. 208, S. 1639, Immigration.
Ted Kennedy, Russell D. Feingold, Daniel K. Inouye, Tom Carper, Sheldon Whitehouse, Pat Leahy, Richard J. Durbin, Benjamin L. Cardin, Ken Salazar, Frank R. Lautenberg, Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, John Kerry, Charles Schumer, Ben Nelson, B.A. Mikulski.

   Mr. REID. I now ask unanimous consent that the mandatory quorum required under rule XXII be waived, and I therefore withdraw the motion.

   The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


30 posted on 06/25/2007 3:57:07 PM PDT by deport ( Cue Spooky Music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

I understand how that works, but the first cloture vote is for the purpose of bringing it back on the floor. The second vote would be whether or not to let the bill go to final vote. So you can still kill it with the second cloture vote.


31 posted on 06/25/2007 4:02:27 PM PDT by Oldhunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Aria

Exactimundo.


32 posted on 06/25/2007 4:03:14 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: deport
Mr. Robert would roll over at the rules under which the Senate uses

The House Rules, however, would do Lenin proud. Someone in the minority can't do anything the majority doesn;t permit!

33 posted on 06/25/2007 4:13:53 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (A person who does not want the best for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Aria
So what are they doing...trying to create cover for what is really a yes on the bill?

Exactly. Supposedly the simple majority needed to pass the bill exists. The problem is shutting off a filibuster, which requires more votes--60.

Senators know that they can vote yes on cloture and stay in the good graces of the party leadership because supposedly that is all the leadership needs to ram this outrage through. Meanwhile, they think they can vote no on the actual bill and fool we the people into believing that they opposed shamnesty.

34 posted on 06/25/2007 4:14:12 PM PDT by freespirited (Mr. President, PUT UP THE WALL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Right now they are debating whether to consider the bill. The first cloture vote would be to end debate on the motion to consider. If it passes, a majority vote would start debate on the bill. The second cloture vote would be on ending debate on the bill and would would essentially as you described it.

I'm also hearing it can die on a budget point of order as well. Stay tuned. There are three hurdles this monstrosity must clear.

Bottom line: keep telling them how you feel.

35 posted on 06/25/2007 4:18:26 PM PDT by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

36 posted on 06/25/2007 4:36:30 PM PDT by Gritty (The immigration debate would be different if we were importing millions of politicians - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I thought A GOOD ‘Ole Phillibuster was means so that horendous legislation NEVER made it to the light of day!!

It’s shameful how the Senate is run today: it’s almost a DICTATORSHIP.


37 posted on 06/25/2007 4:42:24 PM PDT by JSDude1 (Republicans if the don't beware ARE the new WHIGS! (all empty hairpieces..) :).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot
He will then offer an amendment that has made the approved list to strip out the path of citizenship in the bill (meaning no green cards).

The tune Bond is playing:


38 posted on 06/25/2007 4:44:50 PM PDT by Plutarch (Bush is a coward to the left and a tyrant to the right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

Just say NO to Illegal Alien Amnesty!! Keep calling!! It’s NOT OVER!!

U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121

U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121

White House comments: (202) 456-1111

Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep

Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm


39 posted on 06/25/2007 5:11:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

bttt


40 posted on 06/25/2007 5:15:31 PM PDT by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President, 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson