Posted on 06/23/2007 1:28:02 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
I was talking about Rudy Giuliani.
But if you want to be rude when you don’t even read through responses to see what they were responses to (as it were) feel free.
>> “Jehovah Witness?”
> I don’t think that would be a problem.
Ok, let’s try Hare Krshnas. If Romney were a Hare Krshna, would that matter?
(They have good food, they are happy people, their music is kinda fun, and aside from being a bloody nuisance at the airport the Hare Krshnas are generally decent folk...)
Or what about if he were a Wiccan? You know: stand around in a circle in the cold winter air, butt-naked and praying to Gaia...
Any issues if Romney were one of these folk?
Regarding the second question, I wonder where they believe Satan came from?
Now give #59 a shot.
Yeah, sure. :)
I want to be fair. There are non-Mormon sources which provide an even handed look. Contrary to popular belief, Mormon belief tends to be diverse and personalize on many off the controversial points (which by the way tend not to be the basics of what we love to teach and edify — talking about the role of Jesus’s sacrifice for sin and death tends to be our topics of obsession) and when I see an article that is so one sided and dismisses other notable opinions then it is usually a red flag.
Wiccans are out. That's Scriptural.
Ouch! That had to hurt! Not that it will make any difference.... :^)
> Romney and the Mormon apologists say different, of course, but Mormonism is very similar to Islam.
Huh????
I defy you to outline the similarities. Support this silly assertion please.
You ask why there is no concern recgarding Harry Reid as a Mormon versus concern over Romney as a Mormon. It is the difference between being a Senator (barely known with little impact on the popular consciousness) and President (the biggest figure in American culture). If a Senator is a little wacky there are 99 other Senators. The difference in impact is comparable to being hit by a bicycle versus being hit by a railroad train.
I never said Jehova, did I?
Besides, dont answer me, answer the book of Mormon, Doctrines and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price.
I am not the author of it, Joseph Smith is, and he made up such fanciful tales that to believe what he wrote is to believe in a cult.
Joseph Smith even wrote that men live on the moon. Are you going to deny that, also?
I do have another question: You said that Mormonism didn’t teach the pre-existence, now that I posted the facts, are you reconsidering the truthfulness of LDS doctrine?
I hope so, and I will try to help you in any way I can to leave
I think he will have posted the entire website on FR before long!
The difference is not one of theology, it is of truth versus lunacy.
LDS doctrine is so far removed from the truth that I cannot trust a person who believes it.
> Hare Krshna? Hmmm...
> Wiccans are out. That’s Scriptural.
So idolators get a Hmmmmm in your books, and Witches get a clear “no”...
You have an interesting world view, that much is certain. And your views on the Falun Gong? If Romney were a Falun Gong, would that matter to you?
Yes, Decker had serious problems.
But unlike the LDS, he never claimed that his words were from God Himself like the LDS does.
Especially the part where men are supposed to live on the moon.
Now, just what is this planet/star KOLOB?
I disagree with mormonism and believe that it is a cult. I believe that those under the influence of mormonism are held in darkness. But that does not make me a mormon hater. On the other hand, I think that anyone it is legitimate to question the judgment of someone who is in this thing.
> You answered ‘no, qualified that...’
> Now give #59 a shot.
Better still, give Remedial English a shot. Read the following passage carefully and slowly for comprehension. It was my well-articulated answer to your question. Pause if you need to, in case your lips get tired. I answered:
>> No. There would be plenty of other good reasons for disqualifying Mr LaVey as candidate for POTUS. Religion would not play a role in my decision.
So again I ask you, what part of “NO” do you not comprehend? When I said “Religion would not play a role in my decision” what part of that was ambiguous or confusing?
your fundamentals still believe that Jesus, Satan, Me, and YOU came from the same person, the perfected flesh Elohim as our Father.
You just placed yourself equal to Jesus...or is it Satan?
Prove to me which is true.
Not trying to be rude, but these are LDS doctrines, and just because you are a spiritual child does not take away the analogy of being brothers to Jesus and Satan at the same time.
That is insanity, not religion, unless you still think Baal worship is a viable religion as long as they dont throw children into the fire...
You really think Romney wants people to search “Mormon Religion” on the Internet?
I doubt that because of what will come up is pretty radical stuff.
Sorry, that does not answer the question, but it was a good bait and switch.
If mormans point to the scripture in Isaiah as the basis for saying that the tablets found by Joseph Smith were inspired by God (i.e., the familiar spirit speaking from the dust), further if they believe scripture is consistent, then how do they get around the fact that the Bible clearly says a familiar spirit is evil?
I don't know much about Hare Krshnas, that's why the "Hmmm..."
Falun Gong? I know bupkus about them.
Gonna answer #59 directly?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.