[DieHard the Hunter]

> You answered ‘no, qualified that...’
> Now give #59 a shot.

Better still, give Remedial English a shot. Read the following passage carefully and slowly for comprehension. It was my well-articulated answer to your question. Pause if you need to, in case your lips get tired. I answered:

>> No. There would be plenty of other good reasons for disqualifying Mr LaVey as candidate for POTUS. Religion would not play a role in my decision.

So again I ask you, what part of “NO” do you not comprehend? When I said “Religion would not play a role in my decision” what part of that was ambiguous or confusing?

[Enosh]

"Better still, give Remedial English a shot."

You try the same.

"There would be plenty of other good reasons for disqualifying Mr LaVey"

In the #59 hypothetical, I removed all other "good reasons."