Hey, don't misunderstand me. I have a personal and professional dislike of Robert Bork. His distortion of antitrust theory and the protection of competitive practices is anathema to me. On the bench as well as in his writings and speeches he is merely a shill for the massive machinery of anticonsumer piracy and the Chamber of Commerce; an institution not known for its protection of the American consumer. Yet, he's articulate, persuasive and, similar to any other type of tyrant, political, economic or judicial, bathes in a pool of self-justification through mistatements and universalization of his conclusions from anecdotal examples.
There are very few people with whom I disagree intellectually that I wouldn't share a beer and ballgame with; fortunately for me, I don't have to exercise that prerogative with Judge Bork because it's certain to not arise.