Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brytani

The media don’t want to talk about exactly how many DNA samples were found in Crystal. They usually say “at least 3” or “at least 4” samples.

Yesterday the lawyer presented a table with the location of the DNA and the various male sources. It looks like at least ten different sources - and they have only analyzed 11 of the 22 panels they were given!!!

Theoretically they could find even more DNA from men. It’s not all semen but it’s DNA in places you wouldn’t get it from shaking hands, e.g., her mouth and both nether regions.

Either Durham-in-Wonderland or Liestoppers printed the table yesterday. I think it was DiW.


217 posted on 06/15/2007 9:17:19 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: ladyjane

The photo presentation was not a line up????? Come on.


221 posted on 06/15/2007 9:19:46 AM PDT by mware (By all that you hold dear..on this good earth... I bid you stand! Men of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

To: ladyjane
Theoretically they could find even more DNA from men. It’s not all semen but it’s DNA in places you wouldn’t get it from shaking hands, e.g., her mouth and both nether regions.

And some of it 3+ days old could indicate she had a strong aversion to showers or bath water.
223 posted on 06/15/2007 9:21:08 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

To: ladyjane

Haven’t seen the table, but this is the report. It’s not lunchtime reading material though.

http://www.newsobserver.com/content/news/crime_safety/duke_lacrosse/20061213_dukelacrosse.pdf


228 posted on 06/15/2007 9:23:30 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

To: ladyjane

The Defendants have, upon examining those thousands of pages, discovered that DNA Security ifentified DNA from multiple males in the accuser’s anus, in her public region, and on her panties. Enough of that DNA existed for DNA Security to conclude that none of it matched the Defendants, their teammates on the 2006 Duke University Men’s Lacrosse team, or anyone else who submitted a DNA sample in the investigation.

From the report - multiple samples but no number.


243 posted on 06/15/2007 9:35:29 AM PDT by Brytani (Keeper of the FR Loofah, Bath-cap and Rubber Duckie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson