Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rather Attacks Couric: 'Dumb It Down, Tart It Up'
News Busters.org ^ | June 11, 2007 | Scott Whitlock

Posted on 06/11/2007 3:12:50 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Kaslin

This coming from Dan Blather, an expert at “dumbing it down”.


41 posted on 06/11/2007 5:18:51 PM PDT by Bullish ( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B.O. Plenty

At least Dan put some effort into it. He paid good money for fake documents, etc. Along comes Couric who thinks she can get by on looks alone, putting no effort into attracting the young 50-65 demographic.


42 posted on 06/11/2007 5:20:52 PM PDT by kenth (I got tired of my last tagline...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

That or:

 

 

Daniel Irvin Rather, Jr. (born October 31, 1931 in Wharton, Texas) was an anchor for the CBS Evening News.

 

 

 

 

43 posted on 06/11/2007 5:21:16 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Dumb it down, tart it up, or lie it through - your choice Danny.


44 posted on 06/11/2007 5:22:25 PM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Loser tells loser how to keep on losing.


45 posted on 06/11/2007 5:24:14 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Bush needs to be impeached for the illegal immigration bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

Come think of it only thing that could probably save CBS news monk it is Looter guy


46 posted on 06/11/2007 6:15:43 PM PDT by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

47 posted on 06/11/2007 6:17:30 PM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

See he is so presentable on CBS news

Honorable in suit yeah hold a beer LOL!


48 posted on 06/11/2007 6:20:50 PM PDT by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Ahh, cut it out, Dan...like your news was informative?!?! U R halucinating again....OVERDOSE...bedwetter!

I can be a nice guy - really...but I'd RATHER NOT.

49 posted on 06/11/2007 6:27:25 PM PDT by kickme (...at the window watching...waiting for my NUKalert to go off....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I think maybe Paris Hilton will get a job working for Barbara Wawa, now that Rosie is gone.


50 posted on 06/11/2007 6:27:34 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

HA, HA, HA, HA,HA, HA,HA, HA,HA, HA,HA, HA,HA, HA,HA, HA, the sad thing is that you are RIGHT!!!!!


51 posted on 06/11/2007 6:30:14 PM PDT by kickme (...at the window watching...waiting for my NUKalert to go off....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: B.O. Plenty

Go away Dan....retire to Smithville never to be heard from again.

Swell little town....don’t MESS with Smithville, TEXAS, Dan.


52 posted on 06/11/2007 6:59:30 PM PDT by Republican Babe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Republican Babe
No. It’s not go away -it is DESTROY Dan & all of his ilk. They do like McDougal said of the Klintoons- like a tornado, they come in & destroy then leave all of the garbage behind for the rest to clean up. Destroy these liberals before thay get the chance to destroy us & rational society. Is there any Americans out there that will stand up to that challange?
53 posted on 06/11/2007 8:41:16 PM PDT by Digger (If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
I think the tart has become bitter...

The tart was bitter long ago, now *both* are merely rotten...

the infowarrior

54 posted on 06/12/2007 1:11:27 AM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kenth

At least Dan put some effort into it. He paid good money for fake documents, etc. Along comes Couric who thinks she can get by on looks alone, putting no effort into attracting the young 50-65 demographic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I am in that demographic and I would much RATHER watch the squirrels in my yard than watch Couric, a vastly overrated chipmunk who never had any looks to speak of and certainly is not eye candy at this late date. I saw Raquel Welch on the tube a few days ago and she has Couric beaten one hundred to one for looks and one thousand to one for brains and class. Maybe they should have made Raquel the anchor.


55 posted on 06/12/2007 4:18:17 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Does anybody still believe this is a free country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

LOL!

Looter Guy doing the news.....I had never seen that one before.


56 posted on 06/12/2007 8:15:50 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
CBS: Couric’s Failure Due To Sexist Americans

Katie Couric continues as America’s Victim at CBS. Last month, CBS VP Linda Mason told its Public Eye blog that Couric’s lack of success came from an innate sexism in the America, which she said preferred to get its news “from white guys”. Yesterday, CBS made that their official stance when CEO Les Moonves told a Newhouse School of Communications group that people don’t want their news from a woman (via Memeorandum):


Leslie Moonves, CBS chief executive, on Tuesday suggested that sexist attitudes were partly to blame for the faltering performance of Katie Couric, the news anchor he recruited to the network with a $15m annual pay package.

“I’m sort of surprised by the vitriol against her. The number of people who don’t want news from a woman was startling,” Mr Moonves said of the audience’s reaction to Ms Couric, who this month brought ratings for the CBS Evening News to a 20-year low.

"He reiterated, however, that he was committed to Ms Couric and that he believed her programme would succeed in spite of its last place standing behind rivals ABC and NBC....

"Ms Couric has managed a 2 per cent increase in women age 18 to 49 since her September debut. However, that has been more than offset by an 11 per cent decline among men over 55, who still constitute the bulk of the evening news’ audience."


Apparently, the decline in that last demographic has fueled the bunker mentality at CBS that paints Couric as the victim of a Neanderthal reaction. However, Moonves in the same speech acknowledged that CBS moved away from “hard news” when they replaced Bob Schieffer with Couric in favor of an emphasis on human-interest stories. Not only did that not attract a large following among younger viewers, but it turned off people who watch news to see ... news. Given CBS’ poor demos on younger viewers anyway, even the 2% increase comes as a result of having almost nowhere to go but up.

However, admitting that CBS blew it when they screwed up the formula for the show would put the blame on Moonves for the failure. Admitting that they overpaid for Couric, who apparently brought very little of her Today audience with her to CBS, would also make Moonves look like an idiot. Therefore, Moonves and his team at CBS want to shift blame to the people they supposedly serve — the audience. It’s a strange strategy. Does Moonves really think that he can attract new viewers by accusing them of being chauvinist pigs?

It makes no sense, in any case. Plenty of women successfully anchor local news shows in big-market cities. They don’t appear to have problems with women reporting in any corner of the nation. CBS had Connie Chung co-anchoring with Dan Rather for a while (1993-95). They didn’t can her because the audience abandoned them — she got canned because Rather got jealous over her assignments, and also because Chung acted insensitively towards the Oklahoma City Fire Department in the wake of the 1995 bombing of the Murrah building. ABC has had Barbara Walters anchor the news for a brief period, and many women have featured roles on prominent news magazines, such as CBS’ Leslie Stahl and ABC’s Diane Sawyer.

Even if it were true — which it isn’t — then Moonves is still an idiot. Does he mean to inform Viacom shareholders that he gave Couric a $15 million salary without testing to see whether her gender would be a factor? I call BS. Somewhere, CBS has an entire file cabinet of focus group responses to Couric and/or a generic woman anchoring the nightly news. It would have either shown that the CBS Evening News would tank, if Moonves is correct about the high level of sexism, or it would show that it makes no difference.

If the former, then Moonves is a poor executive for making that kind of investment in a losing proposition. If the latter — which is a certainty — then the fault lies not with the audience, but with CBS for airing a stinker of a news broadcast. Moonves should stop spending so much time blaming his audience for their taste, and spend more time fixing his organization and the show.

— Ed Morrissey, http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/010224.php

.

57 posted on 06/13/2007 5:29:23 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Since “the news” is really just entertainment, that is about right...


58 posted on 06/13/2007 5:30:14 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well Dan is better looking than Colic and not as liberal.
Dan, do you think people need to listen to filtered news when they can go to the source??

Pray for W and Our Troops


59 posted on 06/13/2007 5:35:18 AM PDT by bray (The co-clintons freed more bombers then they caught)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

CBS should fire Rather for that comment. Oh, wait a minute . . . never mind.


60 posted on 06/13/2007 5:46:15 AM PDT by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson