I’m not tracking what you’re saying. Are you saying that pastors who preach that the Lord brought about “all this” as Scripture says are “hucksters”? Or that pastors who say that Scripture isn’t really true and that frogs turned into princes over the course of a million, no a billion, no a trillion years are the hucksters?
I’m hoping you mean the latter, that it’s the anti-science hucksters who proclaim that bugs and monkeys and men all share the same rights and that God is either dead or impotent and that death didn’t *really* enter the world through sin, as Scripture says.
Just for the record frogs would not be found anywhere in the lineage leading to humans. Sure, there would be some amphibians in the human lineage, but they would be of a far more generic type.
Frogs are obviously a specialized and divergent line of amphibians, and certainly represent a "side branch" wrt to whatever line of amphibians led on to reptiles and then mammals.
When you mention "scripture", are you referring to some random ancient scrolls translated from the verbal campfire tales of various wandering tribes of bronze age goat herders? If so, is this the evidence you present to bolster your ridiculous counter argument against the status of 21st Century science?