[The KG9 Kid]

"... There was that umbrella guy..."

Yeah, see. Now this is what Shooter 2.5 and myself are talking about (at least on the previous JFK threads over the years here at FR) where we note that just about every single conspiracist we counter here in the forum is woefully or deliberately ignorant of the basic facts in the case as examined by the Warren Commission and the later House investigation of 1978.

You bring up just this sort of point: Do you know the identity of 'The Umbrella Man', why he was carrying an umbrella in Dallas in November along the parade route, and why he unfurled it?

The man has a name and an identity and was investigated to the HSCA's satisfaction.

Please tell us what you know about him and what role you think that he played, if any, in the murder of JFK.

[Radix]

I was introduced to this subject matter when I was about 14 years old.

I do not need a college degree to tell me that my eyes can see things.

You can tell me about why the umbrella guy was standing there....and the rest, since you know so much about the incident. Mr. Expert.

Some guy just happens to be opening an umbrella in front of the precise spot where a shooter (who was part of a conspiracy, maybe) blew a hole in the head of our President, and you suggest that is perfectly ordinary on a day when it ain’t wasn’t even raining.

Were you a Draft Dodger as well?

Go away.

[Shooter 2.5]

Don't you remember the conspiracy "theorists" who thought there was a gun in the umbrella complete with telescope aiming device built into the handle? I wonder if that's on the net?

Wow. Found it.

Maybe this is what Radix believes. ROTFLMAO

He said he didn't know guns. Maybe he knows about umbrellas????

[tpaine]

we note that just about every single conspiracist we counter here in the forum is woefully or deliberately ignorant of the basic facts in the case as examined by the Warren Commission and the later House investigation of 1978.

Dream on kid. You pro-report mavens are also "woefully or deliberately" ignoring some of the basic facts written in the Report and in the later House investigation of 1978, - and as seen in the Z-film.

You fellas cannot refute the timeline facts I've posted here [#16] that makes Specters single bullet theory, for all practical purposes, impossible to duplicate.

Without that single bullet theory, the 'Oswald as the lone gunman theory' falls apart.

Admit it. - The Report's theories are fatally flawed; - so why defend them?
I truly do not understand why you fellas are so absolutist about defending these gov't theories.