You're plainly saying that it cannot be proven that Oswald didn't murder the President. Period.
Is that what you said?
No existing evidence can prove to you that Oswald even fired a single shot at Kennedy?
>>all of the evidence gathered — ballistic, material, witness, culpable, rational, motivational<<
I’m not ignoring anything. There has been no absolute PROOF that Oswald 1)acted alone or for that matter, 2) fired at the motorcade. Even if there was, there isn’t absolute proof that Oswald fired the shots that hit anyone. Proof in this case is the lower standard common in civil cases of preponderance of the evidence. Forget about reasonable doubt; Oswald couldn’t be held liable in a civil case if you go through ALL the evidence.
>>You’re plainly saying that it cannot be proven that Oswald didn’t murder the President. Period.<<
No, that’s NOT what I’m saying. I’m saying it can not be proven (or at least, hasn’t yet) that Oswald killed Kennedy. I’m not sure where you’re getting the double negative there.
>>Is that what you said?<<
Nope.
>>No existing evidence can prove to you that Oswald even fired a single shot at Kennedy?<<
There is conflicting evidence here. I’m not going to go through it all, but will say this: IF Oswald WAS on the 6th floor window during the killing time, he did not fire the fatal head shot. That came from the front.
Explain THIS Evidence:
(WCT)
Mr. SPECTER. And did you have a reaction or impression as to the source of point of origin of the second shot that you described?
Mr. (Clint) HILL. It was right, but I cannot say for sure that it was rear, because when I mounted the car it was—it had a different sound, first of all, than the first sound that I heard. The second one had almost a double sound—as though you were standing against something metal and firing into it, and you hear both the sound of a gun going off and the sound of the cartridge hitting the metal place, which could have been caused probably by the hard surface of the head. But I am not sure that that is what caused it.
This is my point. If you read the actual testimony of WC interviewees you will find a lot of things that weren’t brought out in the report and are still glossed over today by people who are convinced Oswald acted alone. It is those people, in my view, that have the burden of proof since there is nothing conclusively proven about any of this, contrary to many’s assertions.