>>all of the evidence gathered — ballistic, material, witness, culpable, rational, motivational<<
I’m not ignoring anything. There has been no absolute PROOF that Oswald 1)acted alone or for that matter, 2) fired at the motorcade. Even if there was, there isn’t absolute proof that Oswald fired the shots that hit anyone. Proof in this case is the lower standard common in civil cases of preponderance of the evidence. Forget about reasonable doubt; Oswald couldn’t be held liable in a civil case if you go through ALL the evidence.
>>You’re plainly saying that it cannot be proven that Oswald didn’t murder the President. Period.<<
No, that’s NOT what I’m saying. I’m saying it can not be proven (or at least, hasn’t yet) that Oswald killed Kennedy. I’m not sure where you’re getting the double negative there.
>>Is that what you said?<<
Nope.
>>No existing evidence can prove to you that Oswald even fired a single shot at Kennedy?<<
There is conflicting evidence here. I’m not going to go through it all, but will say this: IF Oswald WAS on the 6th floor window during the killing time, he did not fire the fatal head shot. That came from the front.
IF it came from the front.
PROVE IT.