Why always so dour and grim, EV? :-(
Posted on 05/29/2007 7:48:09 AM PDT by Quicksilver
“True leaders lead, they’re not led around by the nose by public opinion polls.”
That idealism worked great for Alan Keyes, eh, EV?
Seriously, if we do’t have a response to the Global Warming Alarmists, we can expect Commisar Hillary to run the show.
One asset Romney brings to the table is his articulateness. If he uses it to help deflect the AlGore type hype, great, but if he follows McCain’s route and just parrots the media convention wisdom, it would be a big setback.
LOL...more like more of the Left's fondest agenda with the cover of a "Republican" smiley face.
Mitt Romney is more likely than any candidate, if elected, to forward the worst elements of the Left’s agenda. That’s his record.
Yes, it has the potential to be a ‘slippery slope’, but see post #59... Romney was saying the right things, even in 2004, so he’s not a RINO on this issue ...
“Unfortunately, some in the Republican Party are embracing the radical environmental ideas of the liberal left. As governor, I found that thoughtful environmentalism need not be anti-growth and anti-jobs.”
“But Kyoto-style sweeping mandates, imposed unilaterally in the United States, would kill jobs, depress growth and shift manufacturing to the dirtiest developing nations.”
“Republicans should never abandon pro-growth conservative principles in an effort to embrace the ideas of Al Gore. Instead of sweeping mandates, we must use America’s power of innovation to develop alternative sources of energy and new technologies that use energy more efficiently.”
- Gov Mitt Romney, 2004
My conclusion is that he is threading the needle on this issue in the right way, defending the conservative position without letting the leftists accuse him of being ‘anti-environment’.
Like the lefties do with Bush, even though it is a farce:
http://travismonitor.blogspot.com/2007/05/nothing-but-blue-skies.html
Why always so dour and grim, EV? :-(
Well, what’s *YOUR* proposal for how conservative Republicans should address the Global Warming issue? without coming off as ‘anti-environment’, which will cause them to lose the election.
“Mitt Romney is more likely than any candidate, if elected, to forward the worst elements of the Left’s agenda. That’s his record.”
Let me add that if I believed that, I wouldnt touch him with a ten foot pole.
And btw you lose a lot of credibility with that talk when we both know the “most likely to advance liberalism” candidate is Rudy G. I know you dont like Mitt, but you are going to have to keep your attacks to a more believable level of hysteria.
It's about time someone does it. Energy independence is a national security issue. It doesn't have to be about Global Warming at all. In fact, it is irrelevant. A smart conservative will embrace the energy independence issue and handle it in the right way.
Mitt is on the right side of this issue as well.
I am honored that you found a previous posting from me and reposted it. I recognize it and strongly believe in what I wrote. Do what do I owe this honor ?
Get real. Read the contents of what he actually implemented. It's clearly a radical enviro document...one that puts the lie to Romney's cover story.
Great quote, Maneesh, a keeper!
“The underpinnings of a socialist model sap the human spirit and creativity and entrepreneurship which is the root of all growth in an economy. ... Socialism has failed every where it has been tried.”
The wolf in sheeps’ clothing is always more dangerous than the wolf that’s running around in the woods in his own skin.
Apply your own criteria to Mitt Romney.
Romney is a text book example of the success you can achieve in our great free enterprise system. He is a very successful businessman, has raised a great family and is now pursuing public office not just to make money and a lust for power like the Clintons did. I don’t see anything socialist in the principles of his life. You can certainly make the argument that he is not conservative enough on some issues but he can hardly be labeled a socialist. Guliani and McCain are much bigger violators of conservative principles in both public and personal life.
Specifically his health care plan is hardly socialist unless you consider mandatory car insurance to be socialist as well
You have not offered any substantiation of your claims other than repeating that Romney’s plan is the same as Hillary Care. Hardly the display of intellect befitting a FR level conservative discussion.
Answer me this, is mandatory car insurance a socialist idea ?
If you choose to respond with another “Romney is a socialist” line then with respect to my own intellect I will have to bow out of the discussion because we can’t make headway with pure cliched statements with no logic or facts to back them up.
His personal life means nothing to me. What matters is public policy. And when it comes to public policy, it is hard to imagine a more liberal record than the one possessed by Mitt Romney.
By the way, when it comes to Mitt Romney’s socialized medicine scheme, you and he find yourselves in complete agreement with Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and James Carville. They love MittCare, and have praised it to high heaven.
Bingo.
“His personal life means nothing to me. What matters is public policy. And when it comes to public policy, it is hard to imagine a more liberal record than the one possessed by Mitt Romney.”
Personal life is very often a very good indicator of what a person will do in office. As I said Mitt Romney may not pass the smell test on every conservative issue but the records of Guliani and McCain are way more liberal.
Guliani: Pro-abortion, gun-control, pro-gay marriage and a messed up personal life
McCain: McCain-Fiengold Campaign Reform and the disastrous shamnesty bill.
I would even say Bush has been a huge disappointment with the immigration bill and out of control spending.
Romney is by no means the perfect candidate but of the current crop until Fred Thompson makes it official, Romney is our best candidate that is electable nationally.
Wrong. He’s not electable at all. His nomination would fracture the Republican coalition.
I, for one, will NEVER cast a vote for him, and I will urge as many voters as possible to do the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.