Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hal1950

There must be some way she can be removed from office. Judicial misconduct?


3 posted on 05/28/2007 8:40:33 AM PDT by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Joann37
Judges place great store on precedent, and the one precedent that no judge wants in his/her name is a precedent for removing a judge.

They, more than anyone else, know how slippery the law really is. What seems cut, dried and ironhard in this case might be bent into a rubber pretzel by some hotshot young legal beagle, the ramifications of which might just turn around and bite butt in a totally strange direction.

As a result, anything that can be targeted against any of the black-robed Lords and Ladies of the bench is to be treated with the utmost suspicion and distaste.

Yes, this sow is a disgrace and an embarrassment, but they would much rather wait her out and shuffle her out the door at the end of her term that establish a “precedent” that might be turned against them in the future.

27 posted on 05/28/2007 8:58:31 AM PDT by Ronin (Ut iusta esse, lex noblis severus necesse est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

“There must be some way she can be removed from office.”

With a crane perhaps?


45 posted on 05/28/2007 10:07:26 AM PDT by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson