Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
Get your own commandments that are logically deduced from the “no God” hypothesis, write your own unholy book and form your own civilization. Then let’s see how appealing it is, how it betters the planet and how far you’ll get.

Of course, they already did that, and we did see how far they got. Right up to about 1991 for most of them.
4 posted on 05/27/2007 9:53:02 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country. Thompson/Franks '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Pack Knight
Get your own commandments that are logically deduced from the “no God” hypothesis, write your own unholy book and form your own civilization.

Atlas Shrugged, for example. Ayn Rand was one of those who tried to get the last 6 Commandments without the first four. Not coincidentally, there were neither children nor humor among the heroes of her civilization. In fact, the only children in that whole wretched tale -- met only in passing -- were nothing more than little grown-ups.

The precise problem with an atheistic approach to objective morality is that it must rely on something other than God. Ayn Rand never satisfactorily answered the question of why people shouldn't behave like the rest of nature -- she simply assumed that they mustn't do so. It was her secret nod to the necessity for God, but she'd never have admitted it.

6 posted on 05/27/2007 10:01:03 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: The Pack Knight
Get your own commandments that are logically deduced from the “no God” hypothesis, write your own unholy book and form your own civilization.

Atlas Shrugged, for example. Ayn Rand was one of those who tried to get the last 6 Commandments without the first four. Not coincidentally, there were neither children nor humor among the heroes of her civilization. In fact, the only children in that whole wretched tale -- met only in passing -- were nothing more than little grown-ups.

The precise problem with an atheistic approach to objective morality is that it must rely on something other than God. Ayn Rand never satisfactorily answered the question of why people shouldn't behave like the rest of nature -- she simply assumed that they mustn't do so. It was her secret nod to the necessity for God, but she'd never have admitted it.

7 posted on 05/27/2007 10:01:08 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson