Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freeport

What benefits does a commercial version of the C-17 have over other commercial aircraft? Short field landings?


10 posted on 05/23/2007 12:37:46 PM PDT by T.Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: T.Smith
What benefits does a commercial version of the C-17 have over other commercial aircraft? Short field landings?

Short field landings on rough fields including gravel runways. They could be used to carry large cargo to remote regions of the world where Fedex and other conventional freighters can't land.

14 posted on 05/23/2007 12:41:04 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: T.Smith

Skydivers?

Paratroopers use it; must be one heck of a windblast!


16 posted on 05/23/2007 12:42:00 PM PDT by Loud Mime (An undefeated enemy will always be an enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: T.Smith

That is one of them. They can operate out of airports that other aircraft of it’s size cannot.


17 posted on 05/23/2007 12:44:30 PM PDT by stm (Believe 1% of what you hear in the drive-by media and take half of that with a grain of salt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: T.Smith
To date, it’s the only heavy lifter that can land on unprepared fields. The An-12x and C-5s all need llllloooonnnggg runways to put down on.

However, according to the GAO:

Military Airlift: Comparison of C-5 and C-17 Airfield Availability (Letter Report, 07/11/94, GAO/NSIAD-94-225).

The Air Force has greatly overestimated the number of airfields worldwide that can accommodate the wide-bodied, C-17 cargo plane; when runway strength is considered, the C-17's wartime advantage over its C-5 predecessor shrinks from 6,400 to about 900 airfields. The C-17 advantage dwindles even further when only airfields that have been determined by the Air Force to be suitable for military operations are considered. So far, the Air Force has surveyed about 2,800 airfields as suitable for military operations. When wartime landing requirements, including minimum runway strength, are considered, the C-17's wartime airfield advantage is 145. When airfields in the United States, Canada, and Mexico are excluded, the C-17's wartime advantage falls to 95 airfields. Although the Air Face claims that the C-17's ability to land at small, austere airfields during wartime is a significant military advantage, the Defense Department has identified only three such airfields that the C-17 would use in major regional contingency scenarios; two are in Korea and one is in Saudi Arabia.

18 posted on 05/23/2007 12:46:56 PM PDT by Freeport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: T.Smith

Besides the replies about rough field landings, the C-17 can load some amazing sized cargo. I watched the C-17 accompanying Cheney load up the SS detail limo and Suburbans. The Suburbans were loaded side by side. How many commercial haulers can do that?


26 posted on 05/23/2007 12:57:12 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: T.Smith
What benefits does a commercial version of the C-17 have over other commercial aircraft?

- It can handle oversize and outsize cargo - something not every airliner converted to a cargo aircraft can do.

- It can land with a full payload of many tons on shoter and unimproved fields, making it capable of delivering things like heavy equipment to places where a B-747 converted to a cargo aircraft cannot do. Same for takeoff.

But, it is damned expensive aircraft.


42 posted on 05/23/2007 3:40:59 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson