1 posted on
05/23/2007 12:25:04 PM PDT by
Freeport
To: Freeport
To: Freeport; COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; ...
I wonder if Boeing will develop a higher gross weight version with longer range? It's current shortcoming is that it can't fly transatlantic routes with a full payload without refueling. It's too bad Dick Cheney forced Lockheed to destroy the machine tools for building the C-5 back in the early 1990's when he was Secretary of Defense.
![](http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/gallery/images/md17/bc17x-inflt.jpg)
![](http://0055a6e.netsolhost.com/images/ping.gif)
If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.
To: Freeport
And all through the halls of AirBust not a creature is stirring, not even a mouse (rat).
5 posted on
05/23/2007 12:34:21 PM PDT by
stm
(Believe 1% of what you hear in the drive-by media and take half of that with a grain of salt)
To: Freeport
Dave Bowman, who adds: Ive never received RFPs before. Good to see him back at work. Something wonderful, indeed.
To: Freeport
What benefits does a commercial version of the C-17 have over other commercial aircraft? Short field landings?
10 posted on
05/23/2007 12:37:46 PM PDT by
T.Smith
To: Freeport
AlGore will require new owners of this plane to buy some SERIOUS carbon credits.
19 posted on
05/23/2007 12:49:52 PM PDT by
wbill
To: Freeport
Boeing will shut it down.
It’s the last of McDonnell Douglas non fighter aircraft.
They will be happy when no more MD plants are needed.
To: Freeport
Would the BC-17 be used for passengers or for civilian cargo?
30 posted on
05/23/2007 1:17:53 PM PDT by
em2vn
To: Freeport
This aircraft isn’t an effective commercial cargo carrier since the DOD has different design requirements than the commercial cargo sector. You can bet that the companies looking to buy this have some fat government contracts lined up to justify the extra cost of operating the aircraft.
35 posted on
05/23/2007 2:05:11 PM PDT by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: Freeport
why is FAR21.27 an obstacle to making the bc-17 “civiliansized”
To: Freeport
BC-17? A bomber version of the C-17 Globemaster? I guess the B-52s couldn’t last forever.
55 posted on
05/23/2007 6:00:40 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
("Caesar - he is a barbarian and considers that the customs of his tribe are the laws of Nature")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson