Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jpsb
You wrote, “Well if we are going to define everything it isn’t this will be a very long thread indeed.”

That’s why I used Buckley’s definition, as a way of establishing a kind of commonly agreed upon starting point and then taking it from there. ‘Loyalty to the Constitution’ is fine, but the wording is open to a great deal of potentially conflicting interpretation. You know what you mean, and I’m pretty sure I know what you mean, but someone else could have an entirely different idea about what constitutes loyalty to the Constitution and still be equally correct, logically speaking. Simplicity is comforting and helps when getting one’s head around complex abstractions, but does little to further an argument or clarify meaning.

142 posted on 05/22/2007 12:14:44 PM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: Rembrandt_fan

that is why I wrote #139, should have pinged you.


143 posted on 05/22/2007 12:24:34 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

To: Rembrandt_fan

RF,

The Constitution means what the Founders thought it meant, not what the modern reader thinks. So look to the Founders. If we do that, there is very little that can be honestly disagreed upon.


153 posted on 05/22/2007 1:14:15 PM PDT by Red Phillips (Ron Paul 2008. Because following the Constitution is not optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson