Dear wouldntbprudent; you have a lot of catching up to do.
FYI; GrandEagle is correct in stating there is no substantial difference. This can be shown by simply looking at the people the POTUS has chosen for his cabinet, and lo and behold; they are all the same kind: Globalists. One-worlders. Socialists. Promoters of "democracy" all over the world. Very eager to interfere in the internal affairs of other nations, all the while working to flush our own country.
Doesn't matter which "flavor" the POTUS, they always promote the same kind of folks to powerful positions.
Is there a way out of this mess? Yes. We need to educate ourselves, then others, and hopefully find conservative candidates we can support. Then get others who are like-minded to help us support them.
Not Rudy McRomney.
Furthermore, your tactic of voting for the least harmful candidate, and "planning the next revolution" will not work for the simple reason that when liberal Republicans gain power, it breeds more liberal Republicans.
Too many people such as yourself are getting their "education" from the MSM.
I could engage your points,and will if you like, but I notice that you simply repeat the *conclusion* that "there is no substantial difference" between the administrations of the two major political parties.
Is there a reason you and everyone else stating that *conclusion* decline to give even one specific example?
I asked, and quite politely, if those with this view would at least hazard a guess as to the type of person who would be Secretary of Defense and head of Homeland Security in a Rat administration compared to in a Republican administration.
I know we can't predict specific names, but we know enough about each party to know the type of person they would gravitate to for these positions.
Yet, instead of answering my question, you pronounce I am ignorant and uneducated and start a sentence with the ever-impressive "FYI." Okay, where is the information, please?
You have stated nothing but tautologies. Duh. "There's no difference because there's no difference."
I'm more than willing to learn from you, but for that to happen you must back up your stance with examples.
I have given examples, here and on the quiz thread. Why won't you?
Why won't anyone who slaps down the *conclusion* that it won't make a whit of difference to the country whether the Rats or the Republicans are handed power in 2008?
Any guesses?
Could you at least tell me if you dispute the examples I have given?
Go for it!
But if we haven't completed this process by 2008, tell me why it's okay to facilitate handing the country over to the Rats.