I could engage your points,and will if you like, but I notice that you simply repeat the *conclusion* that "there is no substantial difference" between the administrations of the two major political parties.
Is there a reason you and everyone else stating that *conclusion* decline to give even one specific example?
I asked, and quite politely, if those with this view would at least hazard a guess as to the type of person who would be Secretary of Defense and head of Homeland Security in a Rat administration compared to in a Republican administration.
I know we can't predict specific names, but we know enough about each party to know the type of person they would gravitate to for these positions.
Yet, instead of answering my question, you pronounce I am ignorant and uneducated and start a sentence with the ever-impressive "FYI." Okay, where is the information, please?
You have stated nothing but tautologies. Duh. "There's no difference because there's no difference."
I'm more than willing to learn from you, but for that to happen you must back up your stance with examples.
I have given examples, here and on the quiz thread. Why won't you?
Why won't anyone who slaps down the *conclusion* that it won't make a whit of difference to the country whether the Rats or the Republicans are handed power in 2008?
Any guesses?
Could you at least tell me if you dispute the examples I have given?
Same thing.
BTW; this is something you have to find out for yourself. I did over 14 years ago. Been studying this ever since. There's not way I could give you a three-paragraph thumbnail sketch.
You don't even have the proper frame of mind (open) to accept it anyway. When you have decided you want to learn, you will find it.