The source is SKY NEWS. Should be THE SKY IS FALLING NEWS!
“Does this mean that in 5 years, we can do whatever the crap we want?”
A better question is, “Why do you listen to these idiots and why aren’t you doing whatever the cr@p you want to do RIGHT NOW?” LOL!
“The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) warns governments have until 2012 to “plant the seeds of change” and make positive moves to limit carbon emissions.”
These are the same idiots that CONSTANTLY send me shill letters asking for money and including page after page of self-stick address labels for me to use. How they got my name in the first place, I do not know.
Now, I ask you...what good “Enviro-Wacko” would do this? How many “carbon emissions” are released in the printing and transporting and mailing of these stupid address labels from their door to mine?
What a bunch of dorks. See my tagline. You’d think THAT sentiment would settle the debate once and for all. :)
Now, please excuse me while I eat an imported 80% cocoa, Rain Forest destroying chocolate bar while I toss an old car battery into my creek, just for the fun of it! *SMIRK*
If Hillary wins, these dire predictions will be instantly revised. It’s got nothing to do with science, and everything to do with politics.
“Good. Does this mean that in 5 years, we can do whatever the crap we want?”
YES!
Hey Al, is that you? With people like you on this planet it may not be worth saving.
Hey Al, is that you? With people like you on this planet it may not be worth saving.
Great ! That means only 5 more years of Howie Mandel and “Deal Or No Deal”
The first order of business is to knock out that pesky sun.
Yeah right. As if there is anything we could do in the next five years that would make a difference. Even if we successfully implemented Kyoto, we would be lucky if we made even a few hundredths of a degree difference over the next hundred years.
I didn't really need to ask which party he was member of.
1: They set an artificial timetable of five years
2: They claim that supposed greenhouse gas emissions could be cut by 80% through renewables, and
3: They insist that nuclear power is not a necessary component of that 80%
One need not look forward. These positions identify them, unequivocally, as political hacks.
The lib papers are so hot IslamoPC now they should just follow their own advice. For example, don’t they know that the 12th Madhi is going to craw out of the well in Qom and save a lot people (except all of those non-Sharia of us who will be beheaded).
See there is absolutely no reason to worry about global warming. The Madhi has it and most else covered according to the wise Iranian nutjob err..philosopher whom the MSM says deserves the utmost respect by all unenlightened Westerners.
Five years? I might take up smoking again!
Wrong...I hear Syler is going to blow it up next week.
WWF, I’ll bet you 10 million dollars the planet lasts longer than 5 years. If I win, you pay me 10 million. If you win, I won’t have to pay you since we will be dead.
So, there should be no reason for you to turn down my bet, right? You won’t have to pay off, right? What? You say you won’t bet? Why not??
I'm in the carbon dioxide business.
It ain't goin' away.
According to Dr. Paul Ehrlich, we only have a negative twenty years...who to believe?
Their line is sounding like a bad life insurance salesman, below quota, at the end of a month.