Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: misterrob
How does RIAA have the power to take someone’s life savings?

Its MO is to subpeona Internet service providers for the Internet addresses of people who may have downloaded music from one of the MP3 sites that proliferate on the Internet. Since addresses are usually assigned on a rotating basis for short periods of time, tying an address to specific activities a given person may have been engaged in is highly problematic. RIAA files a suit in a distant jurisdiction in the literal name of "John Doe" (A string of midnight riders attached to various pieces of recent legislation allows them to do this!) requiring whoever lives at John Doe's address to pay a "settlement" of some huge number picked out the air. These suits ave been filed against the dead, people who don't use computers, but everyone just pays up because it's cheaper than hiring a lawyer and traveling to a court in some distant state.

The new bill from Gonzales would increase the penalty to life in prison, slacken the evidence standard to "potential" infringement, and have Homeland Security report violations directly to RIAA. This makes record labels an arm of the federal government.

I'm sure this bill will not be voted out in its present form. Just like all the other times, we will wake up one morning to find that it has passed as an amendment to a bill for fish hatchery inspection.

162 posted on 05/15/2007 12:40:49 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: BlazingArizona; misterrob
> ...[require that] Homeland Security report violations directly to RIAA. This makes record labels an arm of the federal government.

WORSE THAN THAT

It makes the Federal Government an enforcement arm of the RIAA.

163 posted on 05/15/2007 12:50:42 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

To: BlazingArizona
These suits ave been filed against the dead, people who don't use computers, but everyone just pays up because it's cheaper than hiring a lawyer and traveling to a court in some distant state.

How can they do that? Since when do you not have to file suit in a venue which can in some way be tied to the defendant?

170 posted on 05/15/2007 2:47:00 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson