Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNC letter to FreeRepublic: Stop Lying about Howard Dean, and Gov Sebelius...OR ELSE!
Sandler, Reiff & Young, P.C. ^ | May 11, 2007 | Sandler, Reif & Young, P.C. for the DNC

Posted on 05/11/2007 7:32:14 AM PDT by rface

SANDLE, REIFF and YOUNG, P.C.
50 E Street, S.E., Suite 300
Washington DC 20003

Telephone: 202.479.XXXX FAX: 202.479.XXXX

May 10, 2007

VIA E-Mail

Mr. James C Robinson FreeRepublic.com PO Box 9771 Fresno, CA 93794

Re: Statement re Democratic National Committee

Dear Mr Robinson:

We are writing on behalf of our client, the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

A post by “coffee260” on FreeRepublic.com today states that this morning, on the Quinn & Rose show on XM, co-host Quin stated that the DNC chairman, Gov. Howard Dean had called Gov Kathleen Sebelius (D-Kans) “around 5:00am on morning after a tornado destroyed the town of Greensburg, Kansas and discussed with here what to say about the tornado and how to blame the war in Iraq and the Bush administration on a slow response to the aftermath.”

The statement was made by Mr Quinn, repeated on FreeRepublic, is demonstrably, unequivocally and absolutely false. Gov Dean had no such conversation with Gov Sebelius, ever.

No effort was made by FreeRepublic to contact anyone at the DNC for comment or to check the accuracy of these statements before they were published. FreeRepublic not only repeated this statement, but further stressed that Quinn’s “source” was extremely reliable and in a position that would give him direct knowledge of these revelations.

The statements quoted above are false and defamatory, are libelous and slanderous and clearly threaten to interfere with the DNC’s operations and ability to solicit support and raise funds by predjuding the organization in the eyes of the Democratic Party supporters and the public. For these reasons, we demand that FreeRepublic immediately cease and desist from Further dissemination of the above quoted statements or any statements similar in substance and immediately post a retraction of these statements in a location on its web pages at least as prominent as that on which the original story appeared.

Please let us know by noon, May 11, 2007, whether you intend to comply with these requests.

Thanks for your time and immediate attention to this important matter.

Sincerely yours,
(Signature)
Joseph E Sandler


TOPICS: Breaking News; Free Republic; News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: americaistoopowerful; bendsoverforsoros; callthewaaambulance; collusion; deanscream; demagogueparty; democratparty; despotism; dnc; dncbrownshirts; dnctalkingpoints; fairnessdoctrine; fakebutaccurate; fullachitlawyers; goebbelswouldbeproud; greensburg; howarddean; howtostealanelection; jackassparty; kgbdncnwo; makingitup; quinn; sebelius; ucantspell; waaaah; yeaaargh; yurgrammarsux; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,061-1,064 next last
To: doug from upland

If its a crisis then send Shepard Smith. He can stand on a overpass and drink cold water while the people file past looking for help.


901 posted on 05/11/2007 9:56:42 PM PDT by linn37 (Love your Phlebotomist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 898 | View Replies]

To: rface
Based on the convulsive reaction from this Mr. Sandler, one could assume that the story is true and he's trying to squash it by threatening the messenger.

Typical DNC tactics...what a bunch of thugs.

902 posted on 05/11/2007 9:59:45 PM PDT by pray4liberty (Thank You Prayer Warriors for Praying for me & my poor little lungs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy
I’m sorry you disapprove.

Looked to me a sniff just in case for later.

On a lighter note, do you know how to Whittle?

903 posted on 05/11/2007 10:05:02 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 881 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy

Welcome to FR.


904 posted on 05/11/2007 10:16:17 PM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
Hey, look, Jim's middle
initial is "C!" Cuthbert?
Chartier? Coxswain?

CONSERVATIVE.

905 posted on 05/11/2007 10:22:07 PM PDT by null and void (The truth. It is a beautiful and terrible thing, and should therefore be treated with great caution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd
This has legs everywhere.

With luck, more legs than a bucket of millipedes...

906 posted on 05/11/2007 10:29:25 PM PDT by null and void (The truth. It is a beautiful and terrible thing, and should therefore be treated with great caution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

GMTA


907 posted on 05/11/2007 10:39:08 PM PDT by null and void (The truth. It is a beautiful and terrible thing, and should therefore be treated with great caution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
Hmmm... you know, if they do sue..

How can they sue, and for what grievance? That the FR poster accurately reported another person's comments?

Oh yeah, I know that in the US almost anybody can file suit against almost anybody else for almost anything, but getting a judge to allow a frivolous, groundless, harassment lawsuit to go to trial isn't always the slam dunk that so many people think it is.

I won't deny that there are no doubt an entire corps of liberal judges out there who would jump at the chance to preside over a courtroom rectal exam of FR and JR. But the prospect of going up against the team of high powered lawyers who could be hired by FReeper's contributions to a JR legal defense fund would not be exactly what the aggrieved party had probably envisioned at the outset.

I say let the morons sue. After they're figuratively beaten to a pulp in the courtroom, or more likely beforehand, we can ridicule and mock them to our heart's content just as we usually do most of the time around here anyway.

908 posted on 05/11/2007 10:48:49 PM PDT by epow ( Don't complain that thorns grow on rose bushes, thank God that roses grow on thorn bushes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Cuddlebunny? Coco? Creosote? Conkshell? Cool-J? Crankshaft? Carl? Crackerbarrel?


909 posted on 05/11/2007 10:53:19 PM PDT by Silly (http://www.sarcasmoff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rface
thanks for that PDF/copy trick.....

No sweat. Anything to help make FReeping more efficient and productive. And we have to be accurate dontchaknow. Don't want to get any nasty letters from the DNC typo police

Not that truth and accuracy has ever bothered the DNC before. I wonder what's changed.

910 posted on 05/11/2007 11:02:46 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
This sleazeball lawyer writes Jim Robinson a threatening letter, and then this letter is posted by some sleazeball leftist 'Rat on DU. How did it find its way to DU? I doubt that Jim gave it to them; so that would leave, let's see, the sleazeball lawyer as the only party likely to have provided this correspondence to the sleazeball leftist 'Rat site. Hard to take the sleazeball lawyer seriously when he pimps his BS threat letter to the leftists at DU.

You have hit upon the question of the day. I think the DNC shyster has some 'splaining to do.

911 posted on 05/11/2007 11:08:57 PM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies]

To: rface

As per usual, I am late to the party. :^)

This is absolutely hilarious. This has to be a new level of desperation, and it just cracks me up!


912 posted on 05/11/2007 11:26:09 PM PDT by Shelayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Bump


913 posted on 05/11/2007 11:35:30 PM PDT by jedward (Mission '08 - Take back the House & Senate. No Negotiations...No Prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 911 | View Replies]

To: rface
"...post by “coffee260” on FreeRepublic.com today states that this morning, on the Quinn & Rose show on XM, co-host Quin stated that the DNC chairman..."

How does discussing what someone in the media said over the airwaves constitute libel? Answer: it doesn't.

"...called Gov Kathleen Sebelius (D-Kans) 'around 5:00am on morning after a tornado destroyed the town of Greensburg, Kansas and discussed with here what to say'..."

This is like no legalese I've ever seen. It's also like no English I've ever seen.

"The statement was made by Mr Quinn, repeated on FreeRepublic, is demonstrably, unequivocally and absolutely false."

Besides being illiterate, this sentence does NOT say WHAT is "demonstratively false": the discussion about how to blame the tornado on the Bush administration or the entire phone call.

914 posted on 05/12/2007 3:00:39 AM PDT by cake_crumb (NO BLOOD FOR CONGRESSIONAL PORK! WAR IS POPULAR ONLY TO TERRORISTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cweese
"That’s probably because the DNC are a bunch of thieving, lying sumbitches."

FR isn't a news outlet, it's a news discussion forum composed of thousands of members. Neither "FR" or it's individual members are legally obligated to confirm the veracity of facts - though morally and intellectually, all members really ought to make a point of double checking facts and most of the FReepers I know DO. Also, to repeat what I said before, discussing what a media personality said on the airwaves does not constitute libel.

The bottom line is the DNC doesn't have a legal case for libel against FR or any of it's members.

915 posted on 05/12/2007 3:07:11 AM PDT by cake_crumb (NO BLOOD FOR CONGRESSIONAL PORK! WAR IS POPULAR ONLY TO TERRORISTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rface

Yours Truly, Joseph Sandler
Yours Truly, Mr. Joseph Sandler
Yours Truly, Sandler, Reiff and Young
Yours Truly, Mssr. Sandler, Reiff and Young
Sandler, Reiff, and Young Oh my
Yours Truly, Adam Sandler

Adam Sandler it is.


916 posted on 05/12/2007 3:17:42 AM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
"Transcribed from a .pdf, poster admits making typos."

I would like to read the original document. Hopefully it's already posted on this thread...skimming now and saving for later read.

917 posted on 05/12/2007 3:17:52 AM PDT by cake_crumb (NO BLOOD FOR CONGRESSIONAL PORK! WAR IS POPULAR ONLY TO TERRORISTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

Even the original PDF document shows they have no case and are tossing empty threats.


918 posted on 05/12/2007 3:25:12 AM PDT by cake_crumb (NO BLOOD FOR CONGRESSIONAL PORK! WAR IS POPULAR ONLY TO TERRORISTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

I understand what FR is. I’ve been a member here long enough to know that. My original reply was poorly worded...should have been something like “Why would anyone here bother to contact the DNC about this?”


919 posted on 05/12/2007 3:32:34 AM PDT by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks

Sniff, something smells worse than a litter box. Is there any DNC pussies, I mean lawyers, lurking around here?

920 posted on 05/12/2007 5:24:17 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,061-1,064 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson