|
Posted on 05/09/2007 12:10:40 PM PDT by jedward
|
lol...I heard him.
Very good point.. just like most boycotts.. all they do is give more attention to what is being boycotted..
What y’all need is a willing candidate who can get some traction, not all this anti and negative stuff. Very unattractive.
Yes, he has and it’s the conservative base turning the heat up as well.
Pig-in-a-poke refers to a scam originating in the late middle ages, when meat was scarce, but apparently rats and cats were not.
a program that pretends to do, or does, something useful, but which contains code that does something else - this can range from printing silly messages on your screen to trashing your hard drive - it’s the network equivalent of a virus
A software entity that appears to do something normal but which, in fact, contains a trapdoor or attack program.
Any program designed to do things that the user of the program did not intend to do or that disguises its harmful intent.
A type of infestation that hides or disguises itself as a useful program yet is designed to cause damage at a later time.
If you think Rudy is the best we’ve got to offer, we deserve to lose.
And thank you WorkerBee. It takes people working together to get things done and moving forward. I’m just doing what I said I’d do in my moving forward points.
“....he’s the one candidate Clinton’s negatives wouldn’t stand out so great against.”
You have probably put your finger on the exact reason the media helps him along like they do.....
That and the fact that such strong opposition from the far right makes Rudy even more attractive to the independents and moderates. In a way it may actually help him.
If the MSDRivebyM is on his side, that in itself tells me Rudy is no Conservative.
Rudy is a fiscal conservative and social liberal.
What a bunch of crap. The only way to LOSE to Clinton or Obama is to divide and split the Republican Party with a liberal like Rudy. With a liberal like Rudy--you lose the passion, enthusiasm, energy, and volunteer efforts of the traditional base.
If you want to DIVIDE AND SPLIT the Party WIDE OPEN,,,
a liberal like JulieAnnie is JUST THE MAN FOR THE JOB!!!
Yes you are :)
Thanks for your input. I completely disagree with you on all points, except promoting another candidate. Click the link at the top to see the other candidates.
I’m quite busy with doing what I feel is right and the best thing for the Conservative Cause and the Nation at this point in time.
Do you think it "unattractive" to use "anti and negative stuff" against the other liberals, such as Hillary?
Liberal Republicans like JulieAnnie are MUCH MORE DANGEROUS than liberal democrats,,,,
because liberal Republicans BLUR THE DISTINCTION between liberalism and conservatism,,,
making LIBERALISM MUCH MORE ACCEPTABLE!
You want to think that one over? It’s like this: if there are not enough arch-conservatives, no matter how right they may be, they cannot win, however much we may want them to do so.
“What y’all need is a willing candidate who can get some traction, not all this anti and negative stuff. Very unattractive.”
Well, go find yourself one and then promote them on your own thread. I’ll even provide you a link to a thread you might think is less negative and unattractive. My hat’s off to the freeper who took the time to help you.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1829450/posts
Yep. I agree.
Actually, constant negativity gets you very little. It begins, after a while, to sound like nagging.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
