Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
Spktyr said: "DC may just decide to cut their losses and write a new law that’s about as restrictive, which will then cause the whole cycle to start all over."

Judges dislike this practice intensely. There are many cases of judges virtually taking over the direction of government agencies which refuse to respect the court's decisions.

One long-standing case I believe involves voting procedures in one or more southern states. Another involves a large city's fire department's hiring practices.

Imagine the DC Circuit Court enjoining the DC Police Department from charging ANY gun crimes and enjoining the DC prosecutors from prosecuting any such crimes, subject to criminal contempt citations from the Court for violating the Court's orders. Given acquiesence from the higher courts, each individual court has incredible power within their jurisdiction.

77 posted on 05/09/2007 1:16:09 AM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

Agreed, but they may think that that is preferable to losing most of the gun controls that the left has snuck in over the last 100 years.

And it would take *years* to get through the court systems.


78 posted on 05/09/2007 1:17:59 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson