Pitbulls should not be allowed in populated areas. It is absurd to argue otherwise. I know, you probably know one that is a sweet little teddy bear. That’s what all pitbull owners claim. It is odd how these angles have mauled children to death time and time again. Then the owners have the audacity to blame the victim and say the dog must have been antagonized. I’m for very harsh penalties for any owner of a vicious dog that attacks a person. With the exception of the last sentence that is essentially the same argument the gun-banners use, with "pit bull" substituted for "assault weapon," "sniper rifle," or whatever the boogyman of the day is.
Associating my argument to gun control is a logical fallacy. Nice effort though.
A dog is a living being with senses and responds to stimuli. My gun does not.