Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler
Not once in your latest spiel did you give any scriptural evidence whatsoever supporting your belief in the Nicaean Councils version of God. And yet you went on and on lambasting other religions (Mormons mostly) for having non-scriptural beliefs, when as far as I can see they agree with the Bible more closely than you do.

I will ask you one more time. Do you have any Old Testament scripture supporting your belief in the Trinity? I am certain that you don’t. So from what I can see you don’t believe in the God of the Old Testament and you don’t believe in the God of Moses, Noah and Abraham.

100 posted on 04/29/2007 2:40:16 PM PDT by LeGrande (Muslims, Jews and Christians all believe in the same God of Abraham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: LeGrande; Star Traveler
Actually, there's a boat load of support in the Old Testament for the Trinity. Google on, Trinity in the Old Testament.
101 posted on 04/29/2007 2:47:43 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: LeGrande

You said — “I will ask you one more time. Do you have any Old Testament scripture supporting your belief in the Trinity? I am certain that you don’t. So from what I can see you don’t believe in the God of the Old Testament and you don’t believe in the God of Moses, Noah and Abraham.”

Well, I see you’re avoiding the main doctrine and tenet of Christianity — the one attacked most vociferously by the non-Christian cult groups — the doctrine of the Trinity, which explains the nature of the Jesus of the Bible.

I’ve got a long list of verses — Old Testament and New Testament that go over those very things that Christians have done for the last 2,000 years, including at the Council of Nicea, in which they formulated the short version of understanding who the Jesus of the Bible is.

However, seeing that you are so adamantely opposed to it (and this information is available *prominently* on just about *every single* Christian apologetics site and in every Christian teaching from every Christian group) — that means that you’ve definitely already rejected it and would only continue to argue.

So, suffice it to say that you are *against* the Doctrine of the Trinity, the main tenet and foundation of Christianity and who the Jesus of the Bible is. I can accept the fact that you’re opposed to it. It simply means that you’re outside of Christian teachings — that’s all.

But, that’s okay — at least I know what kind of “teaching” you’re coming from, then. For Christians, they do know who the Jesus of the Bible is and that the doctrine of the Trinity is the most fundamental doctrine of Christianity from the beginning...

Sorry to see you outside of Christian teachings...

The best of luck to you in your “other group”....

Regards,
Star Traveler

P.S. — And you *know* you don’t need me to supply you with a single verse in that regard, although I have them all stacked up here, because you can get them virtually *anywhere*. That says a lot about your position there. You are definitely *steeped* in a non-Christian cult teaching...


102 posted on 04/29/2007 2:52:46 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson