You said — “I will ask you one more time. Do you have any Old Testament scripture supporting your belief in the Trinity? I am certain that you don’t. So from what I can see you don’t believe in the God of the Old Testament and you don’t believe in the God of Moses, Noah and Abraham.”
Well, I see you’re avoiding the main doctrine and tenet of Christianity — the one attacked most vociferously by the non-Christian cult groups — the doctrine of the Trinity, which explains the nature of the Jesus of the Bible.
I’ve got a long list of verses — Old Testament and New Testament that go over those very things that Christians have done for the last 2,000 years, including at the Council of Nicea, in which they formulated the short version of understanding who the Jesus of the Bible is.
However, seeing that you are so adamantely opposed to it (and this information is available *prominently* on just about *every single* Christian apologetics site and in every Christian teaching from every Christian group) — that means that you’ve definitely already rejected it and would only continue to argue.
So, suffice it to say that you are *against* the Doctrine of the Trinity, the main tenet and foundation of Christianity and who the Jesus of the Bible is. I can accept the fact that you’re opposed to it. It simply means that you’re outside of Christian teachings — that’s all.
But, that’s okay — at least I know what kind of “teaching” you’re coming from, then. For Christians, they do know who the Jesus of the Bible is and that the doctrine of the Trinity is the most fundamental doctrine of Christianity from the beginning...
Sorry to see you outside of Christian teachings...
The best of luck to you in your “other group”....
Regards,
Star Traveler
P.S. — And you *know* you don’t need me to supply you with a single verse in that regard, although I have them all stacked up here, because you can get them virtually *anywhere*. That says a lot about your position there. You are definitely *steeped* in a non-Christian cult teaching...
I have simply asked you for an Old Testament scripture that verifies your concept of the Trinity. I am certainly not avoiding the subject. Do you really think that simply claiming that such a scripture exists is good enough? LOL
By the way I am not a member of a unchristian Cult that you seem to imply.
But, that’s okay — at least I know what kind of “teaching” you’re coming from, then. For Christians, they do know who the Jesus of the Bible is and that the doctrine of the Trinity is the most fundamental doctrine of Christianity from the beginning...
Now we have come full circle to the heart of the matter. Your concept of Christ or God the Father is not founded in the Scriptures. You don't understand the concept of the God of the Old Testament and the Religions that have been derived from that concept. That is why you fail to understand when I say that the Muslims, Jews and Christians all believe in the same God of Abraham and the Old Testament. The God you believe in is some weird construct created by the Catholics more than 300 years after the death of Christ. The scriptures are perfectly clear when it comes to Christ. Christ is the only begotten Son of God.
I’ve got a long list of verses — Old Testament and New Testament that go over those very things that Christians have done for the last 2,000 years, including at the Council of Nicea, in which they formulated the short version of understanding who the Jesus of the Bible is.
And yet you can't share a single Old Testament scripture that clearly states your definition of what Christ is. I wonder why that is? Maybe because your definition is unscriptural and wrong?
Sorry to see you outside of Christian teachings...
I think it is impossible to be in your contradictory definitions of Christian teachings.
P.S. — And you *know* you don’t need me to supply you with a single verse in that regard, although I have them all stacked up here, because you can get them virtually *anywhere*. That says a lot about your position there. You are definitely *steeped* in a non-Christian cult teaching...
Clearly you have no scriptural evidence or you would have presented it. Implying that I know your version of Christ is scripturally correct is simply wrong. You simply have no evidence to support your belief. Furthermore your stating that I am steeped in a non-Christian cult is actually funny, especially coming from someone who won't even claim a denomination?
Once again, do you believe in the God of the Old Testament? The Jews and the Muslims do.