1 posted on
04/26/2007 2:46:02 PM PDT by
Sopater
To: Sopater
2 posted on
04/26/2007 2:47:26 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
To: Sopater
IMHO, an unemancipated minor has no expectation of privacy, ever. Their parents can read their mail, medical records, email and text messages.
3 posted on
04/26/2007 2:50:32 PM PDT by
CholeraJoe
(Beebers stuned - $5. Two for $8.)
To: Sopater
Well someone’s gotta say it...
This thread is useless without pics!
4 posted on
04/26/2007 2:50:34 PM PDT by
BigTex5
To: Sopater
Nelson is a something that begins with a "p"......what a slime ball pretending to be concerned about the "children"
bet he has a ton of porn on his home computer....
30 posted on
04/26/2007 4:39:53 PM PDT by
cherry
To: Sopater
I would personally like to withhold judgment until both girls in question are 18 and I can view a video reenactment of the act...
several times.
37 posted on
04/26/2007 5:00:30 PM PDT by
socal_parrot
(Rock me Amadeus!!!)
To: Sopater
The “expectation of privacy” might be a legitimate concern, but it’s tough to try to make it stick for things that happen in a public place. Public places have not merely security cams but webcams, phone cams... not to mention bystanders to witness whatever “private” thing might be going on that’s not so private.
I don’t see a “privacy” issue here.
88 posted on
04/29/2007 1:12:58 AM PDT by
Ramius
([sip])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson