To: USMCWife6869
I don’t know how they come to that conclusion from this passage either, but I do remember reading a while back about how some biblical passages were being re-interpreted (i.e. stretched beyond recognition) to be gay friendly.
Basically, any affection between people of the same sex is interpreted to mean the people are homosexual. The centurion cared about his ill servant. They must be gay. What other conclusion could a person come to? (/sarc) Some even say that there was something going on between Jesus and “the disciple whom he loved.”
To: Southside_Chicago_Republican
24 posted on
04/25/2007 12:22:44 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
To: Southside_Chicago_Republican
Some even say that there was something going on between Jesus and “the disciple whom he loved.”
Didn't you read The DaVinci Code? "The disciple whom he loved" is Mary Magdalene, so the romance is all good. ;)
54 posted on
04/25/2007 12:47:28 PM PDT by
Xenalyte
("A cat can give birth to kittens in the oven. That don't make 'em biscuits." - Quanell X)
To: Southside_Chicago_Republican
Maybe homosexuals read the passage to be the first reported case of AIDS. /shrug
55 posted on
04/25/2007 12:47:34 PM PDT by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson