Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jveritas
The documents mention by name the few towns and one district in the Anbar province where Saddam regime wanted the Chemical materials burial sites. Because these towns are located in the Anbar province the heart of the terrorist insurgency in Iraq I will not mention these documents in a public forum for security concerns.

A wise move. And this is a possible reason for the Bush administration to keep their knowledge of these chemicals from the public. Maybe no WMD's per se, but precursers that could quickly be made into chemical weapons. One of these days we need the whole story out there, AFTER the chemicals are found and removed.

Once again outstanding work!

7 posted on 04/23/2007 11:12:33 AM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CedarDave

The liberals and their media have been spreading the lie of no WMD found where in reality so far we did not find stockpiles of Chemical Weapons in its final product from. That is the mistake the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) made when they worked and focused on finding the “stockpiles of Chemical Weapons” rather than focus on the Precursors to make Chemical weapons. For the reason I explained above, I think it was much better and more efficient for Saddam to work on all the Precursors i.e. ingredients required to make Chemical Weapons and store it so they can very quickly produce the final Chemical Weapon when it is required. The estimation that some of these weapons can be produced in one week once the precursors to make it are available.


10 posted on 04/23/2007 11:21:29 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson