A. I’m not a “rudophile”.
B. See my posts above about how you can be true to your cause without being a horse’s rear end.
I may have exaggerated when it comes to your particular case, but I’ll bet we could find folks who have made those exact comments.
And you are right. It’s not for folks thinking EXACTLY like the folks in question. It’s even more ridiculous - it’s for disagreeing on maybe just a few things, after which they are branded as liberals, when their history clearly shows otherwise.
I’m not trying to change anyone. And if my posts about people acting like angst-ridden teenagers raise your blood pressure, then maybe I hit a little close to home, and I apologize.
Do you have a clue why some folks might be eying you more than a little suspiciously at the moment, notwithstanding your civil tone?
it’s for disagreeing on maybe just a few things, after which they are branded as liberals, when their history clearly shows otherwise.
***It’s not just for disagreeing. It’s for showing nastiness, running down conservatives to build their candidate up, berating JimRob, breaking the rules etc. It’s for their BAD BEHAVIOR. Just read through the thread. You’ll see it. If I were the owner of the site and someone called me the stuff that’s been called, I would have acted sooner than JimRob. He’s shown amazing patience. One example: CeltJew Libertarian called JimRob a closet homosexual several weeks ago. But he didn’t get the boot until a couple of days ago and he deserved it (It was on another thread). Read through the recent events before you come to a conclusion like that.