Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Coopster

it’s for disagreeing on maybe just a few things, after which they are branded as liberals, when their history clearly shows otherwise.
***It’s not just for disagreeing. It’s for showing nastiness, running down conservatives to build their candidate up, berating JimRob, breaking the rules etc. It’s for their BAD BEHAVIOR. Just read through the thread. You’ll see it. If I were the owner of the site and someone called me the stuff that’s been called, I would have acted sooner than JimRob. He’s shown amazing patience. One example: CeltJew Libertarian called JimRob a closet homosexual several weeks ago. But he didn’t get the boot until a couple of days ago and he deserved it (It was on another thread). Read through the recent events before you come to a conclusion like that.


9,669 posted on 04/25/2007 4:43:48 PM PDT by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9597 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo

In that case, I find it highly hypocritical to not ban those from both sides that are guilty of the exact same type of behavior.

Individuals who are reacting to attacks are one thing. Folks who start out acting like idiots are another. And that goes for both sides.

And besides, when did stooping to the level of others become status quo? For that matter, when did it become something even close to proper? You can still respond to a horse’s ass with politeness, and in many cases make your point in a much clearer way.


9,688 posted on 04/25/2007 4:50:37 PM PDT by The Coopster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9669 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson