What about the placenta which is coating the inside of the womb etc? And the child’s separate blood supply? Have you considered the logistics of transplanting everything to do with the child?
How much easier just to leave the child in the first womb and allow her to retain her womens’ rights?
It is a woman’s “right” to bear the child created by the One Who Created her.
JS, this is getting barbaric as you look for ways for women to excuse themselves from the right to bear God ordained life. When a woman rejects the miracle of bringing life into the world, she rejects God.
This is the point of this entire thread. If this country accepts abortion, pregnancy transfers or whatever you call it, it rejects God, and we then have nothing and are enslaved to a pagan society that respects NO human life.
This entire abortion industry is incrementally moving towards just WHOSE life is viable? If the libs take control and force socialized medicine upon us, we will move from PBA to infants, from infants to children. What about the aging baby boomers as a liberal government sees them as less viable than the liberally indoctrinated 20 year olds.
This isn’t about finding alertnatives for women who want to terminate their pregnancies!!!! This is about God, life and freedom to live as God ordained us to do. This is why Jim is taking a stand, and it is about time we all do. If we stand up against incremental liberalism, with God’s help, we will stand against radical terrorists....because we definately don’t stand a chance without Him.