Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just sayin
It is my position that removing choice is wrong. I don’t think it is productive to remove choice entirely. To me, that is trying to solve one wrong with another. I just seek something better.

You say you against abortion. Why? If you believe that a baby is being killed, then you cannot be for letting people have choice in the matter. Why would we give people a choice to end another innocent human life? That is murder. Are we solving one wrong with another when we prevent a murder from taking place?

If we are talking about solving one wrong with another then we are talking about a pro-choice viewpoint. They seek to solve the wrong (accidently pregnancy or rape) with murder.

8,666 posted on 04/25/2007 9:16:26 AM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8649 | View Replies ]


To: Elyse

“””The right to her own body and decisions about what happens to it. We all should respect each other’s right to our own bodies. Wouldn’t you agree?

A woman’s body changes drastically as a result of a full term pregnancy. A female has no right to govern those changes to her own body? You govern those decisions? I do? Government does? Why would a unborn baby have the right to do that when a female should not? Would this not be the very right you just said should not be violated? Keep in mind I seek a solution where no life is lost.”””


He is a pro abortion troll, and he is pretty good at it.

He isn’t really selling the abortion view, he is just good at chewing up a thread.


8,679 posted on 04/25/2007 9:28:01 AM PDT by ansel12 ((America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8666 | View Replies ]

To: Elyse

Elyse, Abortion destroys a growing life. I want to see that practice come to an end. I stated a way I would like to see that happen without removing choice entirely from one who is pregnant.

Why would we employ a ‘wrong’, trying to solve a wrong, if we could employ a ‘right’(read: correct) instead?

I would agree with you that abortion is seeking to employ a wrong to solve a wrong.

Listen closely now OK.....That is why I have said that I don’t find any of the choices today acceptable. This is why I seek another alternative. This is why I say that just a simple outright ban on abortion wouldn’t solve everything and only reverses the situation, thus leaving us with the same conflit we have today.

If you read what I wrote when this whole thing got started, you would see that I want an outcome that ends this conflict, not just flips it around the other way.

If life is retained and choice is retained, where is your opposition?


8,993 posted on 04/25/2007 12:17:15 PM PDT by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8666 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson