A Leftists idea of choice is one thing. Mine is very different. I seek a choice that does not involve the loss of life of another.
Sanctity of life is part of my position. Even if some here refuse to acknowlege that reality.
You are ignoring the reality of millions of babies a year being killed by “choice” while you put forth a fantasy proposal that may never be, and even if it will be possible is fraught with problems.
You’re a very young male, right?
It does have its little complications, though. Suppose we transfer baby A from womb A to womb B. Now we are back where we started from. The choice to abort has simply passed from the real mother to a surrogate. How shall we prevent abortion the second time? Transplant to womb C, and so ad infinitum.
But wait! Surrogate mother C bears the child, who then will not only have three mothers, perhaps all having legal rights and claims, and one hag-ridden father, but a dozen unexpected half-brothers and sisters. Pandemonium ensues -- especially on birthdays and Christmases. Then they all grow up and have scores of first half-cousins and one-third aunts and uncles and nephews and nieces or two-third aunts and uncles and nephews and nieces, some of whom may marry their half cousins, and at the weddings, which side of the aisle do you sit on?