I didn’t slither away. I’m just tired about all the vile garbage I’ve seen posted on Free Republic lately. That’s what I was hoping would blow over.
As for your stalking, you pop out of nowhere and harass people. I’m not the first and I won’t be the last.
Now, buzz off.
I'm tired of getting in trouble for posting the vile garbage. ;o)
YOU post the vile garbage, and accuse me of things I did not do and never did.
I read FR everyday, and see many threads, and refresh the latest posts constantly.
So I see your posts. And if you are posting your digs (harassment actually) to good posters and doing your little "mod" thing and if I feel like it, I will call you on it.
Yea, I’ve done it with you, and others too.
So you rationalize your saying I’m stalking you by making up a fantasy that I “pop out of nowhere and harass people”. I don't harass people you do. You did it on this thread and got called on it by several posters. I don't "pop out of nowhere", get a clue and see how this forum works
If you don't want to be called on what you do, change your posting methods.
Yea, HLL has you convinced I harassed her and got her banned. What BS. Your friend HLL had a dig at the management of FR in her EVERY post for some time before she was banned. And accused me of stalking her when I posted to her after not posting to her for a year.You are using her lame tactic, where did it get her?
You need examples of me stalking you or others, and harassing others or you need to retract your lying accusations.
Look over my posts. Go back as far as you like.
You won’t see me stalking or harassing anyone.
No I won’t “buzz off” Evening Star. Prove your statements or apologize.
Several people called you on your foolish statement on this thread. It’s not only me that sees you as an antagonizer and a shill for liberalism.
Oh and your history of sticking up for anti-freepers is pretty outlandish.
But you never answered ANY of my questions,
Why is that?? You can’t be that afraid of a conservative, can you?
To: EveningStar
“I’m done. I’m sticking to my own threads and hoping this will blow over.”
So you are asked to explain yourself, and the best you can say is “I’m done”.
Is your ‘embarrassment’ because you are considering supporting ‘liberal’ Rudy, and your ‘shame’ for even considering it.
If you intend to be ‘silent’ then my assumption would be ‘yes’.
If not, then maybe further explanation will clear the air.
But if your ‘embarrassment’ and ‘shame’ is because I REFUSE to compromise my principals and vote for ‘liberal’ Rudy, then you are waisting your time.
Neither you or ANYONE on this site will convince me that the road back to true ‘conservatism’ is through a person who is only ‘slightly left’ of Hillary Clinton.
So which is it?
5,674 posted on 04/23/2007 8:22:24 PM EDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)