They wouldn’t have you anyway. They are far less tolerant of dissenting opinion than JR is. Here, they can support evolution. There, you can’t support creation.
I wonder how fascistic censorship evolved? Free and open inquiry would seem to be a far better survival strategy, not to mention more scientific.
>>They wouldnt have you anyway. They are far less tolerant of dissenting opinion than JR is. Here, they can support evolution. There, you cant support creation.<<
Believing the first life was created doesn’t conflict with the evidence - rational scientists don’t argue otherwise. Its when someone claims that the earth is only 6,000 years old that people with science backgrounds tend to assume the person is not reasonable enough to bother with.
To clarify, the term “young earth creationist” is sometimes used.